Pelvic tuberculosis a common infectious cause of human death remains a global health problem, primarily in developing countries .Diagnosis of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis is challenging as it is rarely pinpointed by clinical symptoms, laboratory and radiological findings of low specificity. Pelvic tuberculosis should be considered in young women presented with pelvic mass, ascites and elevated serum CA 125. A series of fourteen cases between the 20 to 70 years are being reported having spectrum of clinical feature and creating diagnostic dilemma. The final diagnosis was made by histopathology after FNAC, laparoscopy or laparotomy are reviewed here. So the aim was formulation of high degree of suspicion aided by intensive investigation for timely diagnosis of genital tuberculosis, to see the response of antituberculer therapy and avoid unnecessary extended surgery.
Background : Management of pregnancy with good fetal and maternal outcome is a challenge to the obstetrician which can be achieved by screening the risk factors of Intra Uterine Fetal Death (IUFD) and thereby prevent, control and treat them by quality preconceptional and antenatal care. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study, done in a tertiary care hospital during a period of two years where 100 pregnant women with history of intrauterine fetal death were included after informed written consent. Intrauterine fetal death was confirmed by Ultrasonogram. Different risk factors and maternal complications were observed. Then data was analyzed with the help of SPSS-20. Results: Among 100 women, maximum patients were aggregated between age group 26-35 years (45%) and next to which was 16-25 years (35%) primipara was 32% and multipara was 31%. Regarding Antenatal care (ANC) 32% patients attended two antenatal visits and 28 % patients had no antenatal visits and 18% patients completed > 5 visits. Regarding causes of IUFD, 34% due to hypertension in pregnancy, 14% mother was severely anemic, 13% mother had Diabetes Mellitus (DM) abruptio placenta was found in 15% mother, maternal gastroenteritis 05%, maternal fever 09%, cord accident 3% and in 19% cases no causes were identified. Regarding maternal complications, blood transfusion needed in 28% patients, PPH occurred in 12% patients, Sepsis 08%, caesarean section needed in 07 % cases, ARF 4%, DIC in 03% cases and maternal mortality 01%. Mean ± SD of total hospital stay was 4 ± 1.5 days. Conclusion: There are different risk factors of IUFD which if identified earlier,then by treating the correctable etiologies, recurrence of IUFD and its related maternal complications can be prevented or reduced. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.18 (1); Jan 2019; Page 23-26
Background: Mid trimester abortions constitute 10%-15% of all induced abortionsworld wide. Over the last decade this increase is due to better prenatal screening. Itcan be done by surgical and medical methods. Medical methods such as Misoprostolis widely used for mid trimester abortion. Mifepristone has antiprogesteroneproperty,so addition of Mifepristone with Misoprostol can increase its effectiveness.To assess the safety, effectiveness and acceptibility of combined Mifepristone andMisoprostol for mid trimester medical termination of pregnancy (Between 13-24weeks of gestation). Materials and methods: This experimental study was conducted among 40 healthywomen who presented for mid trimester termination of pregnancy between 13-24weeks with missed abortion, gross congenital anomalies with or without previoushistory of one caesarian section. The study was conducted from March October2018 at Chattogram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College, Chattogram,Bangladesh. Each woman received a single dose of tablet Mifepristone 200mg. After24 hours, 200 mcg vaginal Misoprostol was administered which was repeated at 6hourly interval for maximum of 5 doses (1000 mcg) in 24 hours. Success was takenas complete expulsion of fetus and placenta within 24 hours of first dose ofMisoprostol. Primary and secondary outcomes were measured. Statistical analysiswas done using SPSS version 23. Results: Success rate of complete abortion was 97.5%. Mean Induction AbortionInterval was11.59 hours (SD± 3.34). Mean dose of Misoprostol was 1.85 (SD± 0.77)or 370 mcg. Over all safety of the study was satisfactory with only 1 patientexperienced fever and 1 had nausea .There was no major complication. Conclusion: The Mifepristone/Misoprostol regimen is a highly effective as well assafe option for mid trimester medical termination of pregnancy with a shortinduction abortion interval and it can also be used in scarred uterus with closesupervision. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.19 (1); January 2020; Page 63-67
Background : Pregnancy-also known as gestation is the time during which one or more offspring develops inside a woman. A multiple pregnancy involves more than one offspring, such as with twins. Pregnancy usually occurs by sexual intercourse, but can occur through assisted reproductive technology protedures. To assess the efficacy of oral Nifedipine and I/V Labetalol for lowering BP in severe PIH after 28 weeks of pregnancy. Materials and methods: In this study 100 subjects were selected with severe pregnancy induced hypertension as per inclusion criteria. After taking informed written consent they were randomly allocated into two groups, A & B. Group A received initially tablet nifedipine 10 mg orally with repeated doses of 20 mg every 20 minutes upto five doses while Group B received intravenous labetalol 20 mg initially followed by escalating doses of 40, 80, 80 and 80 mg every 20 minutes until the therapeutic goal blood pressure Systolic £ 150 mmHg & diastolic £ 100 mmHg was achieved. Primary outcomes were the time interval and the number of doses needed to achieve a blood pressure of £ 150/100 mmHg, Secondary outcomes were fetomaternal safety, efficacy and side effects of both drugs. The outcomes were recorded in a preformed data collection sheet. All the data were analyzed by computer based software SPSS version 19 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). P <0.05 at 95% level was taken as statistically significant. Results: A total of 100 patients of different ages with mean age of 27.41 years were taken in the study. Primi patients were more in Group A the Group B and mode of delivery was commonly caesarian section (66% vs 78%) in both groups. Proportion of target BP achievement were 100% in Group A and it was 72% in Group B. Need of drug dose and time of reduction was found significantly less among Group A women. Change of mean ± SD, SBP was more rapid in Group A ( 174.90 ± 20.01 vs 158.40 ± 11.13) women who were on Group A oral nifedipine than Group B ( 179.80 ± 16.54 vs 167.40 ± 15.02) i/v labetalol group after first dose. It was same for DBP also. Need of mean dose were less in group A than Group B (1.72 vs 3.30) also total time needed to achieve target BP was less in Group A (34.40 vs 66.0 mins). There was no need of doses exceeding third dose who were on oral nifidipine than i/v labetolol. Both maternal and fetal heart rate was not influenced by both the drugs. Side effects of drugs were found more in Group B (8% vs 4%) and fetal death also more common in there (8% vs 16%). Value of APGAR scores was found higher both at 1 minute and at 5 minutes among Group A neonates than Group B. Significant urine output volume was found in Group A patients than Group B at first hour. Conclusion: Oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol both the regimens are found to be effective in the management of severe PIH. But Nifidipine lowers blood pressure more rapidly with fewer doses with minimum fetomaternal side-effects. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J; Vol.20 (1); January 2021; Page 55-61
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.