The uptake of directed evolution methods is increasing, as these powerful systems can be utilized to develop new biomolecules with altered/novel activities, for example, proteins with new catalytic functions or substrate specificities and nucleic acids that recognize an intended target. Especially useful are systems that incorporate continuous evolution, where the protein under selective pressure undergoes continuous mutagenesis with little-to-no input from the researcher once the system is started. However, continuous evolution methods can be challenging to implement and a daunting investment of time and resources. Our intent is to provide basic information and helpful suggestions that we have gained from our experience with bacterial p hage- a ssisted c ontinuous e volution (PACE) toward the evolution of proteins that bind to a specific DNA target. We discuss factors to consider before adopting PACE for a given evolution scheme with focus on the PACE bacterial one-hybrid selection system and what optimization of a PACE selection circuit may look like using the evolution of the DNA-binding protein ME47 as a case study. We outline different types of selection circuits and techniques that may be added onto a basic PACE setup. With this information, researchers will be better equipped to determine whether PACE is a valid strategy to adopt for their research program and how to set up a valid selection circuit.

USF1, a basic region/helix–loop–helix/leucine zipper (bHLHZ) transcription factor, binds to the E-box in the PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor) promoter. Two alleles containing the E-box control PAI-1 transcription; these alleles are termed “4G” and “5G” based on the G tract flanking E-box. USF1-governed transcription of PAI-1 is elevated in heritable asthma sufferers: the 4G/4G genotype has the highest plasma levels of PAI-1. While USF1 uses its basic region to bind E-box, we found that it uses its 12 amino-acid loop to recognize the flanking sequence and discern the single-nucleotide difference between the alleles. We used the bacterial one-hybrid and electrophoretic mobility shift assays to assess protein–DNA recognition, and circular dichroism to examine protein secondary structure. We mutated Ser233 and Thr234 in the USF1 bHLHZ loop to Ala to generate S233A and T234A. Interestingly, USF1 bHLHZ, S233A, and T234A prefer the 5G sequence (USF1 bHLHZ K d values 4.1 ± 0.3 nM and 7.0 ± 0.4 nM for 5G and 4G, respectively), whereas studies in stimulated human mast cells showed a preference for 4G. We replaced the 8 amino-acid loop of transcription factor Max bHLHZ with the 12 amino-acid USF1 loop: this mutant now distinguishes the 4G/5G polymorphismwhile Max bHLHZ does notconfirming that USF1 differentiation of the 4G/5G is driven by the loop.

Protein-based therapeutics are part of the next-generation arsenal of drugs being developed against proto-oncoprotein Myc. We designed protein MEF to mimic the basic region/helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper (bHLHZ) domain of Max and Myc, which bind to the E-box motif (enhancer box, CACGTG). To make MEF, we started with our rationally designed ME47, a hybrid of the Max basic region and E47 HLH, that effectively inhibited tumor growth in a mouse model of breast cancer. We used phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE), which uncovered mutations at Arg12 that contact the DNA phosphodiester backbone. The Arg12 mutations improved ME47’s stability. We replaced Cys29 with Ala to eliminate potential undesired disulfide formation and fused the designed FosW leucine zipper to mutated ME47 to increase the dimerization interface and E-box targeting activity. This “franken-protein” MEF comprises the Max basic region, E47 HLH, and FosW leucine zipper. Compared with ME47, MEF gives 2-fold stronger binding to E-box and 4-fold increased specificity for E-box over nonspecific DNA. The synergistic combination of rational design and PACE allowed us to make MEF and demonstrates the power and utility of our two-pronged approach toward development of promising protein drugs with robust structure and DNA-binding function.

We designed MEF to mimic the basic region/helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper (bHLHZ) domain of transcription factors Max and Myc, which bind with high DNA sequence specificity and affinity to the E-box motif (enhancer box, CACGTG). To make MEF, we started with our rationally designed ME47, a hybrid of the Max basic region and E47 HLH, that effectively inhibited tumor growth in a mouse model of breast cancer. ME47, however, displays propensity for instability and misfolding. We therefore sought to improve ME47's structural and functional features. We used phage-assisted continuous evolution (PACE) to uncover "nonrational" changes to complement our rational design. PACE mutated Arg12 that contacts the DNA phosphodiester backbone. We would not have rationally made such a change, but this mutation improved ME47's stability with little change in DNA-binding function. We mutated Cys29 to Ser and Ala in ME47's HLH to eliminate undesired disulfide formation; these mutations reduced E-box binding activity. To compensate, we fused the designed FosW leucine zipper to ME47 to increase the dimerization interface and improve protein stability and E-box targeting activity. This "franken-protein" MEF comprises the Max basic region, E47 HLH, and FosW leucine zipper—plus mutations that arose during PACE and rational design—and is a tractable, reliable protein in vivo and in vitro. Compared with ME47, MEF gives three-fold stronger binding to Ebox with four-fold increased specificity for E-box over nonspecific DNA. Generation of MEF demonstrates that combining rational design and continuous evolution can be a powerful tool for designing proteins with robust structure and strong DNA-binding function. <br>