First-exit problems for the Brownian motion (W (t)) or general diffusion processes, have important applications. Given a boundary b(t), the distribution of the first-exit time τ has to be computed, in most cases numerically. In the inverse first-passagetime problems, the distribution of τ is given and the boundary b has to be found. The boundary and the density of τ satisfy a Volterra integral equation. Again numerical methods approximate the solution b for given distribution of τ . We propose and analyze estimators of b for a given sample τ 1 , . . . , τ n of first-exit times. The first estimator, the empirical estimator, is the solution of a stochastic version of the Volterra equation. We prove that it is strongly consistent and we derive an upper bound for its asymptotics convergence rate. Finally, this estimator is compared to a Bayesian estimator, which is based on an approximate likelihood function. Monte Carlo experiments suggests that the empirical estimator is simple, computationally manageable and outperforms the alternative procedure considered in this paper.
KeywordsBayes estimator • Empirical estimator • Inverse first passage times • Markov chain Monte Carlo
The paper analyzes the sensitivity of boundary crossing probabilities of the Brownian motion to perturbations of the boundary.
The first- and second-order sensitivities, i.e. the directional derivatives of the probability, are derived. Except in cases where boundary crossing probabilities for the Brownian bridge are given in closed form, the sensitivities have to be computed numerically. We propose an efficient Monte Carlo procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.