Antidepressant treatment plus quetiapine is possibly a suitable treatment strategy to improve clinical depression, quality of sleep and motor activity. Future research is needed to understand the pharmacological interactions between antidepressants and quetiapine in major depression.

Psychomotor retardation (PR) is among the most important features of depression. This study investigates the development of day- and night-time as well as intensity and quantity of circadian motor activity during a 4-week course of treatment among 27 patients with depression compared to 27 healthy controls. A diagnosis of major depression was made using SCID. Motor activity was continuously measured with an actigraph during the study and clinical course of depression with HAM-D-21. Motor activity was described as the quantity and intensity of movements during day- and night- time. Clinically improved patients had significantly intensified movements after 4 weeks, compared to subjects with <50% improvement on HAM-D. While the measures of day-time level of movements captured the clinical improvement of depression, clinical improvement was not reflected by the night-time measurements. This study demonstrates that the separated analysis of level and quantity of movements supports a better understanding of the nature of psychomotor retardation during depression. The subdivision in day- and night-time activity objectively measured with actigraphy captures distinct patterns of motor activity and represents prognostic factors in the treatment outcome of depression. The study also highlights the importance of studying the intensity of movements separately from the quantity of movements in relation to treatment outcome.

This research assesses the development of the night-activity rhythm and quality of sleep during course of treatment among patients with unipolar or bipolar depression and receiving antidepressant treatment plus quetiapine. Twenty-seven patients with major depressive episode were included into a 4-week follow-up study and compared with 27 healthy controls. Motor activity was continuously measured with an electronic wrist device (actigraphy), sleep was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and patients were clinically assessed with the Hamilton depression score. All patients received a standard antidepressant treatment plus quetiapine. Whereas we found a rapid and maintaining improvement of subjective sleep parameters during the 4-week study, we observed a rapid improvement of some objective sleep parameters (actigraph) within the first week, but no further significant change of objective sleep parameters during the rest of the study. Another main finding of this study is that changes of subjectively and objectively assessed sleep parameters do not necessarily reflect clinical improvement of depression during the same timeline. Despite partial clinical remission, objective sleep parameters still showed significantly different patterns compared with controls. This study is the first to examine the effect of quetiapine on locomotor activity alongside with sleep in depression. As the studied patients with depression showed improvement in subjective and objective sleep parameters, quetiapine may be a promising drug for patients with depression and insomnia. Further studies need to investigate in detail the timeline of clinical remission and alterations of objective and subjective sleep parameters.

No abstract

Objectives. To assess the development of the rest-activity rhythm and quality of sleep during course of treatment of patients with major depressive episode receiving antidepressant treatment plus quetiapine. Methods. Ten patients with major depressive episode were followed over 4 weeks. Motor activity was measured with actigraphy, sleep with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and depression was followed with HAM-D-21 and BDI. Correlations and associations were calculated with non-parametric statistical tests. Results. Circadian motor activity improved during the 4 weeks treatment period only for daytime-related motor activity (M10), but not for night-time-related motor activity (L5). Patients with statistically significant higher sleep efficiency scores and sleep fraction on the actigraph after week 1 showed clinical improvement on the HAM-D score after week 4. Patients with good sleep efficiency at week 1 (assessed by PSQI) showed statistically significant clinical improvement of depression after week 4. Conclusions. Various sleep parameters at week 1 of treatment seem to be predictive for treatment outcome of depression after week 4. Actigraphy and subjective sleep assessment with PSQI are useful tools to predict treatment outcome of depression. The positive effects of quetiapine on motor activity and sleep show the clinical significance of our findings.