Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been used at different doses in cardiac surgery patients. We tested the efficacy of small-dose rFVIIa in patients with intractable bleeding after cardiac surgery. The study group comprised 15 cardiac surgery patients with intractable bleeding treated with small-dose (1.2 mg) rFVIIa as a slow IV bolus at the end of complete step-by step transfusion protocol. Fifteen matched patients undergoing the same transfusion protocol in the pre-rFVIIa era represented the control group. Blood loss at the end of the transfusion protocol was a primary outcome. Median, 25th-75th 24-h blood loss percentiles were 1685 (1590-1770) mL versus 3170 (2700-3850) mL in study group and controls, respectively (P = 0.0004). Transfused red blood cells, fresh-frozen plasma, and platelets in the study group and controls were as follows: 7 (4-8) U versus 18 (12-21) U (P = 0.001); 7.5 (6-11) U versus 11 (9-15) U (P = 0.003); 0 (0-4) U versus 9 (6-13) U (P = 0.001). In addition, significant improvements of prothrombin time (P = 0.015), international normalized ratio (P = 0.006), activated partial prothrombin time (P = 0.01), and platelet count (P = 0.003) were detected in the study group versus controls. Finally, patients receiving rFVIIa showed a reduced intensive care unit length of stay (chi2 = 15.9, P = 0.0001) and had infrequent surgical re-exploration (chi2 = 16.2,P < 0.0001). Small-dose rFVIIa showed satisfactory results in cardiac patients with intractable bleeding. Further randomized studies are necessary to confirm our findings.
In our experience low-dose rFVIIa was associated with reduced blood loss, improvement of coagulation variables and decreased need for transfusions. Our findings need to be confirmed by further larger studies.
background:There is no consensus on which drugs/techniques/strategies can affect mortality in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery. With the aim of identifying these measures, and suggesting measures for prioritized future investigation we performed the first international consensus conference on this topic. methods: The consensus was a continuous international internet-based process with a final meeting on June 28th 2010 in Milan at the Vita-Salute University. Participants included 340 cardiac anesthesiologists, cardiac surgeons and cardiologists from 65 countries all over the world. A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify topics that subsequently generated position statements for discussion, voting and ranking. results: of the 17 major topics with a documented mortality effect, seven were subsequently excluded after further evaluation due to concerns about clinical applicability and/or study methodology. The following topics are documented as reducing mortality: administration of insulin, levosimendan, volatile anesthetics, statins, chronic beta-blockade, early aspirin therapy, the use of preoperative intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and referral to high-volume centers. The following are documented as increasing mortality: administration of aprotinin and aged red blood cell transfusion. These interventions were classified according to the level of evidence and effect on mortality and a position statement was generated. conclusion: This international consensus conference has identified the non-surgical interventions that merit urgent study to achieve further reductions in mortality after cardiac surgery: insulin, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, levosimendan, volatile anesthetics, statins, chronic beta-blockade, early aspirin therapy, and referral to high-volume centers. The use of aprotinin and aged red blood cells may result in increased mortality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.