BackgroundRenal artery stenosis (RAS) is one of the main causes of secondary systemic arterial hypertension. Several non-invasive diagnostic methods for RAS have been used in hypertensive patients, such as color Doppler ultrasound (US). The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a new renal Doppler US direct-method parameter: the renal-renal ratio (RRR), and compare with the sensitivity and specificity of direct-method conventional parameters: renal peak systolic velocity (RPSV) and renal aortic ratio (RAR), for the diagnosis of severe RAS.MethodsOur study group included 34 patients with severe arterial hypertension (21 males and 13 females), mean age 54 (± 8.92) years old consecutively evaluated by renal color Doppler ultrasound (US) for significant RAS diagnosis. All of them underwent digital subtraction arteriography (DSA). RAS was significant if a diameter reduction > 50% was found. The parameters measured were: RPSV, RAR and RRR. The RRR was defined as the ratio between RPSV at the proximal or mid segment of the renal artery and RPSV measured at the distal segment of the renal artery. The sensitivity and specificity cutoff for the new RRR was calculated and compared with the sensitivity and specificity of RPSV and RAR.ResultsThe accuracy of the direct method parameters for significant RAS were: RPSV >200 cm/s with 97% sensitivity, 72% specificity, 81% positive predictive value and 95% negative predictive value; RAR >3 with 77% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 90% positive predictive value and 76% negative predictive value. The optimal sensitivity and specificity cutoff for the new RRR was >2.7 with 97% sensitivity (p < 0.004) and 96% specificity (p < 0.02), with 97% positive predictive value and 97% negative predictive value.ConclusionThe new RRR has improved specificity compared with the direct method conventional parameters (RPSV >200cm/s and RAR >3). Both RRR and RPSV show better sensitivity than RAR for the RAS diagnosis.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Although indicators of surgical and medical treatment have been applied to patients with typical dissection (AD) of the descending thoracic aorta, the natural history of descending aortic intramural hematoma (AIH) is not yet clearly known.Objective: The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that the absence of flow communication through the intimal tear in AIH involving the descending aorta has a different clinical course compared with AD.Methods: We prospectively evaluated clinical and echocardiographic data between AD (76 patients) and AIH (27 patients) of the descending thoracic aorta.Results: Patients had no differences In age, gender, or clinical presentation. The development of pleural effussion or periaortic hematoma was more frequent in patients with AIH than it was in patients with AD. AIH and AD had same predictors of complications at follow-up: aortic diameter (>5 cm) at diagnosis and persistent back pain. Although medical treatment was selected in the same proportion between groups, surgical treatment was more frequently selected in AD (39% vs. 22%, p < 0.01). AD patients who received surgical treatment had higher mortality than those with AIH (36% vs. 17%, p < 0.01). There was no difference in mortality between patients who received medical treatment (15% in AD vs 14% in AIH, p = 0.7). In follow-up imaging studies of 23 patients with AIH,6 patients (25%) showed complete resolution and 6 patients (25%) increased the descending aortic diameter. Typical AD developed in 3 patients (13%). A three-year survival rate did not show significant difference (82 ± 6% in AIH vs 75 ± 7% in AD, p = 0.37).Conclusion: AIH of the descending thoracic aorta have relatively frequent complications at follow-up including dissection and aneurysm formation. Medical treatment with very close imaging follow-up and timed elective surgery in cases with complications allow better management for patients with AIH of the descending thoracic aorta.