artery occlusion (CCAO) has been little discussed in the literature compared with occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA). However, CCAO seems to be a different disease because of its presentation, treatment, and incidence.CCAO is diagnosed in approximately 3% of the symptomatic patients undergoing carotid angiography 1 and in only 1 to 5% of the patients with symptomatic cerebrovascular disease. 2,3 The development of exuberant collateral circulation and patency of the carotid bifurcation seems to protect against ischemic brain lesions. 3 However, several symptoms can occur, including hemispheric stroke, amaurosis fugax, and brain hypoperfusion. 2 To date, no consensus exists for treatment of asymptomatic patients, and decisions for treatment of symptomatic patients are controversial and made according to each case. 4The incidence of common carotid artery occlusion (CCAO) is approximately 3% in patients who undergo angiography for symptomatic cerebrovascular disease; however, few studies have reported on management of this condition. The objective of this article was to analyze risk factors, therapeutic options, and clinical benefits of surgical treatment at a hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Data were collected from medical records of 40 patients with CCAO who were treated from June 2002 to October 2013. Results were analyzed retrospectively. Most of the patients were men (63.0%), who were significantly younger than women. Most of the participants had hypertension (90.0%), and more than half had a history of smoking (52.5%). The mean number of coexisting comorbidities/risk factors was 2.9 AE 1.0. Half of our sample had ipsilateral patent internal and external carotid artery, and 32.5% presented with an occluded internal carotid artery and a patent external artery. Patients with both an internal and an external occluded carotid artery (12.5%) were significantly older. Contralateral arteriosclerosis was observed in 65% of the patients, mainly represented by 50 to 90% stenosis. Most patients were symptomatic (67.5%), and hemiparesis was the most common symptom (55.0%) found. Most (77.5%) of the patients underwent the medical treatment; one out of three endovascular approaches failed. During the mean follow-up of 55 AE 43 months (range, 2-136 months), 17.5% of the patients died within 4 days after surgical repair and after along 123 months of clinical follow-up. Coexisting comorbidities/risk factors were significantly associated with fatal outcomes, such as acute myocardial infarction. This study provides scientific evidences on treatment and outcomes of CCAO.
Objective: The present study evaluated the effect of endovascular administration of calcium chloride to the carotid artery of swines, to create a model of arterial calcification. Methods: Fifteen Large White pigs were used for the study. Via endovascular treatment, carotid arteries were exposed during 9 min to either calcium chloride (experimental artery) or saline (control artery) with the use of the TAPAS catheter. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging was obtained at baseline, postprocedure and at 30 days. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was obtained in vitro after carotids were harvested. Longitudinally cut parallel arterial segments were placed in a system of delicate clamps and underwent uniaxial strain test. All arteries underwent histopathological examination. Results: Calcium chloride treated segments showed extensive circumferential parietal calcification evident on both IVUS and OCT. Reduction in minimal lumen area on IVUS was evident in experimental arteries both at 24 hr and 30 days postprocedure. Histopathologic assessment (Von Kossa stain) confirmed medial calcification with mild intimal thickening. Biomechanical testing showed treated segments to have smaller breaking strength and less elastic deformation than controls. Conclusion: We developed a nonexpensive, reproducible model of early carotid medial calcification in pigs. Our model has the potential to help the development of research to unravel mechanisms underlying arterial calcification, the use of current or new devices to treat calcified lesions as well as to serve as an option for training interventionalists on the use of such devices.
BACKGROUND: Many chronic renal patients lack autologous veins in the upper limbs suitable for construction of arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Alternative fistula options for these patients should be evaluated and compared.OBJECTIVE: To compare different types of grafts used for brachioaxillary access in hemodialysis patients in terms of their patency and complication rates.METHOD: Forty-nine patients free from arterial system abnormalities and with no venous options for creation of arteriovenous fistulae in the arm and/or forearm underwent brachioaxillary bypass with implantation of autologous saphenous vein, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), or PROPATEN(r) grafts. Patients were assessed by Doppler ultrasonography at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery,.RESULTS: The four first saphenous vein grafts had failed by 3 or 6 months after surgery. The autologous saphenous vein group was discontinued at the beginning of the study because of extreme difficulty in achieving puncture and hematoma formation. Failure rates of PTFE and PROPATEN(r) grafts did not differ after 3 (p = 0.559), 6 (p = 0.920), or 12 months (p = 0.514). A log-rank test applied to cumulative survival of grafts at 1 year (0.69 for PTFE, 0.79 for PROPATEN(r)) detected no significant differences (p = 0.938). There were no differences in complications resulting in graft failure between the two types of prosthetic graft.CONCLUSION: Autologous saphenous vein grafts do not appear to be a good option for brachioaxillary hemodialysis access because of difficulties with achieving puncture. Brachioaxillary fistulae constructed using PTFE or PROPATEN(r) grafts exhibited similar patency and complication rates. Further studies with large samples size are warranted to confirm our findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.