The results of two types of experiments are reported. In 1 type, Ss matched depth intervals on the ground plane that appeared equal to frontal intervals at the same distance. The depth intervals had to be made considerably larger than the frontal intervals to appear equal in length, with this physical inequality of equal-appearing intervals increasing with egocentric distance of the intervals (4 m-12 m). In the other type of experiment, Ss viewed targets lying on the ground plane and then, with eyes closed, attempted either to walk directly to their locations or to point continuously toward them while walking along paths that passed off to the side. Performance was quite accurate in both motoric tasks, indicating that the distortion in the mapping from physical to visual space evident in the visual matching task does not manifest itself in the visually open-loop motoric tasks.

No abstract

Two triangulation methods for measuring perceived egocentric distance were examined. In the triangulation-by-pointing procedure, the observer views a target at some distance and, with eyes closed, attempts to point continuously at the target while traversing a path that passes by it. In the triangulation-by-walking procedure, the observer views a target and, with eyes closed, traverses a path that is oblique to the target; on command from the experimenter, the observer turns and walks toward the target. Two experiments using pointing and 3 using walking showed that perceived distance, averaged over observers, was accurate out to 15 m under full-cue conditions. For target distances between 15 and 25 m, the evidence indicates slight perceptual underestimation. Results also show that observers, on average, were accurate in imaginally updating the locations of previously viewed targets.The term visual space (or visually perceived space) refers to a perceptual representation of the immediate physical environment that exists independently of any of the particular spatial behaviors it helps to control. Much vision research has been devoted to establishing the functional properties of visual space and the mechanisms that underlie it. A major goal of such research has been to characterize the mapping from physical to visual space under different conditions of information availability, but ultimately the goal must be to predict visual space solely in terms of its sensory inputs and internal determinants (e.g., intrinsic noise, observer assumptions, etc.).Because visual direction is perceived accurately, most space perception research has examined the perception of egocentric distance (i-e., the distance from the object to the observer) and the perception of exocentric distance (i.e., the distance between two targets lying in the same visual direction or, more generally, the distance between any two locations). Because we believe that the perception of egocentric Gogel, 1977), our focus here is on the former.It generally is accepted that when visual cues to distance are reduced greatly, egocentric distance is misperceived (e.g., Baird, 1970;Da Silva, 1985;Foley, 1977Foley, ,1980Foley & Held, 1972;Gogel, 1974;Holway & Boring, 1941;Kiinnapas, 1968;Philbeck & Loomis, 1997;Sedgwick, 1986). Under "full-cue" conditions, in which a stimulus-rich environment is viewed under good illumination, however, there is little agreement about whether perception is accurate, mainly because of the diversity of findings stemming from different experimental methods. With respect to egocentric distance, much of the research conducted under full-cue conditions suggests that perceived distance is nearly linear in physical distance and appropriately scaled, at least for targets within 20 m (e.g., verbal reports, Da Silva, 1985;Sedgwick, 1986;Teghtsoonian & Teghtsoonian, 1969, 1970 blind walking to previewed targets, Corlett, Patla, & Williams, 1985;Elliott, 1986Elliott, , 1987Elliott, Jones, & Gray, 1990;Loomis, Da Silva, Fujita, & Fukusima, 1992...

The divided visual field technique was used to investigate the pattern of brain asymmetry in the perception of positive/approach and negative/withdrawal facial expressions. A total of 80 undergraduate students (65 female, 15 male) were distributed in five experimental groups in order to investigate separately the perception of expressions of happiness, surprise, fear, sadness, and the neutral face. In each trial a target and a distractor expression were presented simultaneously in a computer screen for 150 ms and participants had to determine the side (left or right) on which the target expression was presented. Results indicated that expressions of happiness and fear were identified faster when presented in the left visual field, suggesting an advantage of the right hemisphere in the perception of these expressions. Fewer judgement errors and faster reaction times were also observed for the matching condition in which emotional faces were presented in the left visual field and neutral faces in the right visual field. Other results indicated that positive expressions (happiness and surprise) were perceived faster and more accurately than negative ones (sadness and fear). Main results tend to support the right hemisphere hypothesis, which predicts a better performance of the right hemisphere to perceive emotions, as opposed to the approach-withdrawal hypothesis.

This study examined the psychometric properties of a Brazilian adapted version of the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS-BR) in a sample of adults in Brazil. Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that the CAS-BR produces a reliable (α = .84), unidimensional construct whose structure was shown to be invariant across gender, race, and age. However, some items of the CAS-BR were stronger indicators of the coronavirus anxiety construct for women and younger adults. Although the CAS-BR demonstrated evidence of discrimination ability for functional impairment (AUC = .77), Youden indexes were low to identify a clinical cut-score. Construct validity was demonstrated with correlations between CAS-BR scores and measures of functional impairment, generalized anxiety, and depression. Exploratory analyses revealed that CAS-BR total scores were higher among women and participants with a history of anxiety disorder. These findings are consistent with previous investigations and support the validity of CAS-BR for measuring coronavirus anxiety with Brazilian adults.