GPS/leveling technique is the most effective engineering method for the determination of heights and height differences. This method is based on the principal of conversion of ellipsoid heights to orthometric heights. For transformation, polynomial surface models are generally used for study region or area. The accuracy of results depends on the location and distribution of selected reference stations with known ellipsoidal and orthometric heights. Especially, in the strip area projects (highway, railway, channel etc.) polynomial curve model is used instead of polynomial surface model due to reference stations disturbing along a route. In this research, Least Squares Collocation (LSC) methods used in determining the geoid heights of a strip area were examined. For this purpose, GPS/leveling data of Bozkurt-Dinar (Afyonkarahisar) train project which is approximately 75 km was used in order to examine LSC methods. The ground control stations of the project were classified as reference and test for the purpose of this research. The geoid heights of test stations were calculated by curve polynomial with different degrees. Additionally geoid heights at the same points were calculated using polynomial curve fitting based on LSC which is suggested by this research. The geoid heights by computed using LSC approach when compared to polynomial curve method were observed to yield better results. ARTICLE INFO
The aim of this study is to present the evaluations based on comparisons of geoid heights that are computed from several global geopotential models (GGMs) and the GNSS/levelling data. In this application framework, differences between geoid heights obtained by GGMs and GNSS/levelling were computed. Then, the availability of geoid heights calculated by GGMs for engineering applications were investigated. The Konya-Polatli (Ankara) Express Train Project as a strip area project was chosen as the study area. The length of the project is approximately 210 km and consists of 110 benchmarks that belong to the Turkish National Triangulation Network. In this study a total of 69 GGMs were compared. In order to examine more detail, these models were classified as three groups based on CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE. Each group was evaluated separately and the results were obtained. According to results, the best five models were detected for geoid height differences (N GNSS/lev -N ggm ) in terms of standard deviation. These are EIGEN-6c4, EIGEN-GRACE01s, EGM2008, EIGEN-6c3stat and EIGEN-6c2, respectively. Also, geoid heights were obtained using different parametric models. These parametric models were used in order to minimize the impact of the terms of bias, tilt etc. Generally, three, four, five and seven parametric models are used for the least-squares adjustment of the geoid height differences in the literature. Therefore, in this study the geoid heights were calculated for such different parametric models. After the geoid height values were computed from the parametric models, the best global geopotential models in terms of standard deviation were obtained as EIGEN-6c2, EIGEN-6c3stat, EGM2008, EIGEN-6c4 and EIGEN-GRACE01s, respectively.El propósito de este estudio es presentar las evaluaciones comparativas de alturas geoidales que fueron computadas a partir de varios Modelos Geopotenciales Globales (GGM, del inglés Global Geopotential Models) y la nivelación de información del Sistema Global de Navegación por Satélite. Luego se investigó la disposición para aplicaciones de ingeniería de las alturas geoidales calculadas por los modelos GGM. Se seleccionó el proyecto del Tren Expreso Konya-Polatli (Ankara) como el área de estudio por ser un terreno lineal. La longitud del proyecto es de 210 kilómetros y consiste de 110 puntos de referencia que pertenecen a la Red de Triangulación Nacional de Turquía. En este estudio se compararon 69 modelos GGM. Para un mejor examen, estos modelos se clasificaron en tres grupos basados en CHAMP (CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload), GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) y GOCE (Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer). Cada grupo se evaluó por separado. De acuerdo con los resultados, se detectaron los cinco modelos mejores para las diferencias de alturas geoidales (NGNSS/LEV-NGGM) en términos de desviación estándar. Estos son EIGEN-6c4, EIGENGRACE01s, EGM2008, EIGEN-6c3stat, y EIGEN-6c2. También se obtuvieron las alturas geoide a través de diferentes modelos paramétrico...
The gravitational field is important for many natural phenomena related to earth dynamics, especially mass transport. Its precise determination is essential for earth sciences such as geodesy, geophysics and oceanography. Determining the earth's gravitational field is the same as determining the earth's potential. Since this potential is a harmonic function outside the earth, spherical harmonic series are often used to represent the gravity field. Global Geopotential Models (GGMs) are sets of spherical harmonic coefficients representing the earth's gravity field at different wavelengths. GGMs developed by scientists are published by the International Centre for Gravity Earth Models (ICGEM). When the structure of the GGMs is examined, it is seen that they consist of different degrees and various data groups. The accuracy and resolution provided by each GGM vary depending on the degree of the model and the data used for developing the GGM. Also, geodetic quantities such as potential, geoid undulation, deflection of the vertical components, gravity, and anomaly values can be derived from GGMs within the framework of mathematical principles. In this study, gravity, geoid heights, and free-air gravity anomaly values at test points using different GGMs produced in recent years have been investigated. The study area contains 98000 test points chosen from the Auvergne test area in France. Within the scope of the study, the geoid undulations, gravity values, and free-air gravity anomalies for all points derived from seven recent GGMs have been compared with ground-truth data and the statistical results have been obtained.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.