Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the demographics and early radiographic treatment outcome of patients with carpometacarpal (CMC) injuries at our institution over a 10-year period. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who sustained CMC injuries of the second to fifth digits between 2005 and 2015. We recorded demographic data, mechanisms of and associated injuries, treatment methods, and complications. Injury and intraoperative and postoperative radiographs were evaluated, and the adequacy of reduction was determined on lateral radiographs of the hand using a grading system that we developed. Results: Eighty patients were included in this study. Delivering a blow with a closed fist was the most common mechanism of injury; however, high-energy mechanisms also made up a large percentage of those included. Injuries to the fourth and fifth CMC joints were most common, and these were frequently associated with fractures of the metacarpal bases and distal carpal row. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning offered a higher percentage of patients with concentric reduction at the time of pin removal. Time to surgery was significantly different between those with concentric reduction and those with residual subluxation. Conclusion: The most common mechanism of CMC injuries was blow with a closed fist; however, these injuries can be associated with high-energy mechanisms. Fractures of the metacarpal base and distal carpal row are commonly seen with these injuries. With early diagnosis, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning achieved concentric radiographic reduction. Delayed diagnosis makes closed reduction difficult and was associated with less favorable radiographic outcome.

Background: Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures encountered in orthopedic practices. If treated operatively, most implants are retained after the fracture heals unless there is hardware failure, limitation of wrist motion, pain, infection, tendon rupture, or tenosynovitis. Complications have been reported during hardware removal, including not knowing the exact implant prior to its removal. If a patient presents for plate removal to a surgeon who did not perform the initial fracture fixation, having a preoperative visual aid can help the treating surgeon choose the right instruments for their removal. Methods: To identify many of the available distal radius fixation devices, we searched the Internet and contacted local industry representatives. We also approached industry personnel at the commercial exhibit of a national hand society meeting to provide us with implants they manufacture. The implants were placed on the volar and dorsal aspects of sawbone models of the distal radius and in one case the radial styloid, using the screws, screwdrivers and accessories in the standard implant set and then posteroanterior and lateral x-rays of the implants were obtained. We created an atlas and a list of the screwdriver(s) used for each. Results: We obtained radiographs and photographs for 28 implants that were manufactured by 14 different companies. Two companies sent us radiographs and photographs placed on either a sawbone or cadaveric model. We found that 7 of the implants were outliers and could be identified easily on the x-rays, whereas 21 implants had similar design of shaft and distal components. Conclusions: To aid the orthopedic surgeon in their removal, we compiled a comprehensive list of most distal radius fixation devices on the market including plates and their corresponding screws and screwdrivers. The goal was to help the surgeon when removing the plate to identify the implant on radiographs.

No abstract

Debate continues in the current orthopedic literature regarding advantages of performing concurrent fibular stabilization in combined distal tibial and fibular fractures. In this case report, we present the correction of tibial malalignment, fibular fixation, and syndesmotic restoration in a 21-year-old male after a high-energy injury where he sustained a fracture of the tibia and fibula at the same level that was initially managed with tibial nailing alone. After initially having delayed union, valgus malalignment and resultant syndesmotic pain and instability following the index surgery, he underwent revision surgery resulting in favorable recovery with cessation of his pain and correction of his malalignment. How to cite this article: Cantrell AJ, Wilson JA, Haleem A, et al. Distal Tibia Delayed Union with Fibular Shortening Causing Syndesmotic Instability and Anterolateral Impingement. J Orth Joint Surg 2019;1(1):31–34.