<b><i>Background:</i></b> Hypophosphatemia in critically ill patients is a common electrolyte disturbance associated with a myriad of adverse effects. Critically ill patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) are at high risk of hypophosphatemia and often require phosphate supplementation during therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of phosphate versus non-phosphate containing CRRT solutions with incident hypophosphatemia in critically ill patients requiring CRRT. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> This is a single-center, retrospective, cohort study at a tertiary academic medical center of 1,396 adult patients requiring CRRT during their intensive care unit stay comprising 7,529 (phosphate containing) and 4,821 (non-phosphate containing) cumulative days of CRRT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the primary outcome of hypophosphatemia during CRRT according to exposure to phosphate versus non-phosphate containing CRRT solutions. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Incident hypophosphatemia during CRRT, serum phosphate &#x3c;2.5 mg/dL or 0.81 mmol/L, was significantly higher in the non-phosphate versus phosphate containing solution group: 304/489 (62%) versus 175/853 (21%) (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Cumulative phosphate supplementation was also significantly higher in the non-phosphate versus phosphate containing solution group: 79 (IQR: 0–320) versus 0 (0–16) mmol (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Non-phosphate solutions were associated with an 8-fold increase in the incidence of hypophosphatemia (adjusted OR 8.05; 95% CI 5.77, 11.26; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusions:</i></b> The use of phosphate containing CRRT solutions was independently associated with reduced risk of incident hypophosphatemia and decreased phosphate supplementation during CRRT. Interventional studies to confirm these findings are needed.

Background and objectivesHypophosphatemia is commonly observed in patients receiving continuous KRT. Patients who develop hypophosphatemia may be at risk of respiratory and neuromuscular dysfunction and therefore subject to prolongation of ventilator support. We evaluated the association of phosphate-containing versus phosphate-free continuous KRT solutions with ventilator dependence in critically ill patients receiving continuous KRT.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsOur study was a single-center, retrospective, pre-post cohort study of adult patients receiving continuous KRT and mechanical ventilation during their intensive care unit stay. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression with and without propensity score matching was used to model our primary outcome: ventilator-free days at 28 days. Intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay as well as hospital mortality were analyzed with a t test or a chi-squared test, as appropriate.ResultsWe identified 992 eligible patients, of whom 649 (65%) received phosphate-containing solutions and 343 (35%) received phosphate-free solutions. In multivariable models, patients receiving phosphate-containing continuous KRT solutions had 12% (95% confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.47) more ventilator-free days at 28 days. Patients exposed to phosphate-containing versus phosphate-free solutions had 17% (95% confidence interval, −0.08 to −0.30) fewer days in the intensive care unit and 20% (95% confidence interval, − 0.12 to −0.32) fewer days in the hospital. Concordant results were observed for ventilator-free days at 28 days in the propensity score matched analysis. There was no difference in hospital mortality between the groups.ConclusionsThe use of phosphate-containing versus phosphate-free continuous KRT solutions was independently associated with fewer ventilator days and shorter stay in the intensive care unit.

No abstract

No abstract

Objective The frequency and implications of an elevated cardiac troponin (4th or 5th generation TnT) in patients outside of the emergency department or presenting with non-cardiac conditions is unclear. Methods Consecutive patients aged 18 years or older admitted for a primary non-cardiac condition who had the 4th generation TnT drawn had the 5th generation TnT run on the residual blood sample. Primary and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality (ACM) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) respectively at 1 year. Results 918 patients were included (mean age 59.8 years, 55% male) in the cohort. 69% had elevated 5th generation TnT while 46% had elevated 4th generation TnT. 5th generation TnT was more sensitive and less specific than 4th generation TnT in predicting both ACM and MACE. The sensitivities for the 5th generation TnT assay were 85% for ACM and 90% for MACE rates, compared to 65% and 70% respectively for the 4th generation assay. 5th generation TnT positive patients that were missed by 4th generation TnT had a higher risk of ACM (27.5%) than patients with both assays negative (27.5% vs 11.1%, p<0.001), but lower than patients who had both assay positive (42.1%). MACE rates were not better stratified using the 5th generation TnT assay. Conclusions In patients admitted for a non-cardiac condition, 5th generation TnT is more sensitive although less specific in predicting MACE and ACM. 5th generation TnT identifies an intermediate risk group for ACM previously missed with the 4th generation assay.