No abstract

BackgroundThis retrospective study evaluated whether diabetes affects motor outcome after stroke by analyzing the effects of diabetes on motor prognosis by controlling for critical factors, including lesion type and location, corticospinal tract (CST) state, patient age, lesion volume, and treatment method during the stroke.MethodologyWe recruited 221 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) of the basal ganglia. We used diffusion tensor tractography to investigate the CST state. We also evaluated the hemorrhage volume. We obtained information on the presence of diabetes and age by chart review. Motor outcomes at 6 months were measured using the upper and lower limb motricity index (MI), modified Brunnstrom classification (MBC), and functional ambulation category (FAC). We used multiple linear regression tests to investigate whether diabetes affected motor outcomes after stroke after adjusting for other factors, including CST state, age, lesion volume, and treatment method.ResultsThe presence of diabetes was not correlated with motor outcome measurements, including upper and lower MIs, MBC, and FAC, at 6 months after the onset. However, the CST state, age, lesion volume, and treatment method were significantly correlated with nearly all motor outcomes.ConclusionsWe found that diabetes did not significantly affect motor outcomes after ICH.

Objectives: Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) is widely used to manage lumbosacral radicular pain due to herniated lumbar disc (HLD). Objectives:We evaluated the long-term outcomes of TFESI in patients with lumbosacral radicular pain due to an HLD by the location, type, and size of the HLD. Methods:In total, 114 patients who received the initial TFESI at least 4 years ago completed a telephone interview. We investigated the presence of radicular pain, degree of current pain, current pain medications and TFESIs, additional TFESIs, progression to surgery, and trouble in performing daily life activities and occupational job duties. We classified the included patients by the location, type, and size of the HLD, and evaluated whether these factors affected the long-term outcomes of TFESI.Results: At least 4 years after the initial TFESI, radicular pain was completely resolved in 45% of the patients. However, 30% patients were on oral painkillers or repetitive TFESIs or had undergone surgery and 15% had difficulty in performing daily life activities and occupational job duties. A larger number of patients with extruded lumbar disc herniation required additional TFESIs than those with protruded lumbar disc herniation. Apart from this, the outcomes did not significantly differ by the location, type, and size of the HLD. Conclusions:Our findings provide useful information to clinicians managing radicular pain due to HLD.

Objectives Transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) can be used to control radicular pain following lumber spinal stenosis (LSS). However, limited information is available on the long‐term prognosis of TFESI in patients with LSS. Methods Of the 90 patients who underwent TFESI for controlling LSS‐induced radicular pain at least 5 years previously, 54 patients completed a phone interview. We inquired about their degree of pain during walking or standing, current oral medication used for radicular pain, current TFESI injections, progression to surgery, and unemployment due to pain at least 5 years after the TFESI for LSS‐induced radicular pain. Results Five to seven years after the initial TFESI, the numeric rating scale (NRS) score had decreased from 6.7 to 3.7. Of the included patients, approximately 65% of the patients had an NRS score of ≥3, although roughly 15% of patients reported complete resolution of the initial pain. Approximately half of the included patients were currently receiving repetitive TFESIs every 2 to 6 months or were taking oral pain medications. Further, approximately 25% of the patients had undergone a surgical intervention; however, its outcome was poor. Conclusion The prognosis after TFESI for controlling LSS‐induced radicular pain is thought to be relatively poor. However, considering poor long‐term outcome and complications after surgery, we believe that TFESI is worth considering as a safe modality for controlling radicular pain following LSS.

No abstract