Non–vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (NOACs) have been used to prevent thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and shown favorable clinical outcomes compared with warfarin. However, off-label use of NOACs is frequent in practice, and its clinical results are inconsistent. Furthermore, the quality of anticoagulation available with warfarin is often suboptimal and even inaccurate in real-world data. We have therefore compared the effectiveness and safety of off-label use of NOACs with those of warfarin whose anticoagulant intensity was accurately estimated. We retrospectively analyzed data from 2,659 and 3,733 AF patients at a tertiary referral center who were prescribed warfarin and NOACs, respectively, between 2013 and 2018. NOACs were used at off-label doses in 27% of the NOAC patients. After adjusting for significant covariates, underdosed NOAC (off-label use of the reduced dose) was associated with a 2.5-times increased risk of thromboembolism compared with warfarin, and overdosed NOAC (off-label use of the standard dose) showed no significant difference in either thromboembolism or major bleeding compared with warfarin. Well-controlled warfarin (TTR ≥ 60%) reduced both thromboembolism and bleeding events. In conclusion, the effectiveness of NOACs was decreased by off-label use of the reduced dose.

No abstract

Background-Chronic lung disease (CLD) is one of the important underlying diseases of atrial fibrillation (AF). The outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF in patients with CLD have not yet been reported. We investigated the electroanatomic alterations in pulmonary veins (PVs) in CLD patients with AF and assessed their effect on the outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. Method and Results-We assessed 15 patients who had CLD and underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. CLD included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a tuberculosis-destroyed lung, and interstitial lung disease. For controls, we selected 60 sex-, age-, and procedure era-matched non-CLD patients who received radiofrequency catheter ablation for AF (4 controls for each CLD patient). Eight patients had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 6 had a tuberculosis-destroyed lung, and 1 had interstitial lung disease. PV morphology in the affected lung was altered significantly, ie, obliteration, pulling of the PVs toward the destroyed lung, or compensatory bulging of the PV antrum. These alterations were related to arrhythmogenicity in 6 (40%) of 15 patients with CLD. Non-PV foci were more common in the CLD group (4/15, 26.7%) than in the control group (3/60, 5.0%; Pϭ0.025). All non-PV foci were located in the right atrium. The AF recurrence rate in the CLD group (26.7%, 4/15) was similar to that in the control group (18.3%, 11/60; Pϭ0.45). Conclusions-Significant alteration of PV anatomy was related to arrhythmogenicity, and non-PV foci from the right atrium were commonly observed in the CLD group. Radiofrequency catheter ablation can be performed safely for AF in CLD patients with a comparable success rate to that in patients with normal lungs. (Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:815-822.)

BACKGROUND:Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective for maintenance of sinus rhythm in 50% to 75% of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and it is not uncommon for patients to require additional ablation after PVI. We prospectively evaluated the relative effectiveness of 2 post-PVI ablation strategies in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS:A total of 500 patients (mean age, 55.7±11.0 years; 74.6% male) were randomly assigned to undergo ablation by 2 different strategies after PVI: (1) elimination of non-PV triggers (group A, n=250) or (2) stepwise substrate modification including complex fractionated atrial electrogram or linear ablation until noninducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmia was achieved (group B, n=250). During a median follow-up of 26.0 months, 75 (32.2%) patients experienced at least 1 episode of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after the single procedure in group A compared with 105 (43.8%) patients in group B (P value in log-rank test of Kaplan-Meier analysis: 0.012). Competing risk analysis showed that the cumulative incidence of atrial tachycardia was significantly higher in group B compared with group A (P=0.007). With the exception of total ablation time, there were no significant differences in fluoroscopic time or procedure-related complications between the 2 groups.CONCLUSIONS: Elimination of triggers as an end point of ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation decreased long-term recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia compared with a noninducibility approach achieved by additional empirical ablation. The post-PVI trigger test is thus a better end point of ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.