The authors reviewed and analyzed information on 74 patients with split spinal cord malformations (SSCMs) treated between January 1, 1980 and December 31, 1996 at their institution with the aim of defining and classifying the malformations according to the method of Pang, et al. Computerized tomography myelography was superior to other radiological tools in defining the type of SSCM. There were 46 girls (62%) and 28 boys (38%) ranging in age from less than 1 day to 12 years (mean 33.08 months). The mean age (43.2 months) of the patients who exhibited neurological deficits and orthopedic deformities was significantly older than those (8.2 months) without deficits (p = 0.003). Fifty-two patients had a single Type I and 18 patients a single Type II SSCM; four patients had composite SSCMs. Sixty-two patients had at least one associated spinal lesion that could lead to spinal cord tethering. After surgery, the majority of the patients remained stable and clinical improvement was observed in 18 patients. The classification of SSCMs proposed by Pang, et al., will eliminate the current chaos in terminology. In all SSCMs, either a rigid or a fibrous septum was found to transfix the spinal cord. There was at least one unrelated lesion that caused tethering of the spinal cord in 85% of the patients. The risk of neurological deficits resulting from SSCMs increases with the age of the patient; therefore, all patients should be surgically treated when diagnosed, especially before the development of orthopedic and neurological manifestations.

The classification of SSCMs proposed by Pang, et al., will eliminate the current chaos in terminology. In all SSCMs, either a rigid or a fibrous septum was found to transfix the spinal cord. There was at least one unrelated lesion that caused tethering of the spinal cord in 85% of the patients. The risk of neurological deficits resulting from SSCMs increases with the age of the patient; therefore, all patients should be surgically treated when diagnosed, especially before the development of orthopedic and neurological manifestations.

These SP shunt complications, some of which are avoidable, should be kept in mind.

Continuous external subdural drainage (CESD) was suggested as a treatment step to be inserted prior to SP shunting, primarily because it makes it possible to avoid shunt placement in a significant number of patients. Thirty-three patients with symptomatic chronic subdural collection confirmed by computed tomography were included in this study. Unilateral CESD was performed in all cases, using a lumbar drainage set. The drains were left in place for no more than 10 days. A subduroperitoneal (SP) shunt was inserted in those patients in whom re-accumulation of the subdural collection had occurred. Of 33 patients, 17 were definitively treated by CESD and 16 subsequently needed an SP shunt. The cost of treatment with CESD was just less than half the cost of treatment with SP shunting. CESD can be used as a step before SP shunting in the management of chronic infantile subdural collections, since it is effective without further treatment in half the patients and safer than subdural tapping.

No abstract