IntroductionAbout 30% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery are diabetic, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a reliable marker for long-term glucose control. The aim of our study was to examine whether tight glucose control before a cardiac operation results in a better outcome of the surgical treatment.Material and methodsWe performed a retrospective record review of 350 diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery in our institution. Preoperative glycemia control was assessed by measurement of the glycated hemoglobin level. The patient population was divided into three groups: group I – patients with HbA1c below 7% (n = 195); group II – patients with HbA1c between 7% and 8% (n = 88); and group III – patients with HbA1c above 8% (n = 67).ResultsThe demographic data and operating risk in all groups of patients were similar. There were 2 deaths (1.02%) in group I, 2 deaths (2.27%, p = 0.78) in group II and 3 deaths (4.47%, p = 0.20) in group III. Cardiac accidents occurred in 9 patients (4.60%) from group I, 7 patients (7.95%, p = 0.20) from group II, and in 6 patients (9.05%, p = 0.40) from group III. Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) occurred in 7 (3.58%), 5 (5.68%, p = 0.67) and 5 (7.46%, p = 0.61) patients, respectively. Acute renal dysfunction requiring renal replacement therapy occurred in 4 patients from group I (2.05%), 3 patients from group II (3.40%, p = 0.78) and 4 patients from group III (5.97%, p = 0.23).ConclusionsA large percentage of diabetic patients referred for cardiac operations have poorly controlled glycemia. Optimal preoperative glycemia control results in lower postoperative mortality and morbidity. In addition, the preoperative HbA1c level is a good indicator of the risk of postoperative complications in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac operations.
Background. The pathogenesis of thoracic aortopathy is complex, and much evidence suggests the influence of genetic factors. Some genes with polymorphisms are widely considered critical factors in the initiation and development of aortic aneurysm. The aim of our study was to analyze the association of genetic polymorphisms of MMP1 rs1799750 (c.-1607G>GG), MMP9 rs3918242 (c.-1562C>T), COL1A1 rs1800012 (c.1245G>T), and COL1A2 rs42524 (c.1645G>C) with predisposition to thoracic aortopathy in Polish patients and with clinical characteristics of these patients. Methods. The study was carried out with 96 patients with thoracic aortopathy (47 patients with ascending aortic aneurysm and 49 patients with thoracic aortic dissection) and 61 control subjects without thoracic aortopathy. The MMP1, MMP9, COL1A1, and COL1A2 polymorphisms were determined by PCR-RFLP. Results. No significant differences in the frequency distributions of MMP1, MMP9, COL1A1, and COL1A2 genotypes or alleles were found (1) between the control group and patients with ascending aortic aneurysm (AsAA), (2) between the control group and patients with thoracic aortic dissection (TAD), or (3) between AsAA and TAD patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that MMP1 and MMP9 polymorphisms were associated with the degree of aortic valve regurgitation. Conclusion. The results of our study did not support associations between MMP1, MMP9, COL1A1, and COL1A2 genetic variants with the risk of thoracic artery disease in Polish patients. However, rs1799750 MMP1 and rs3918242 MMP9 seem to be associated with the degree of aortic regurgitation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.