Using unanesthetized young male and female beagle dogs, before and after a 2-day fast, we studied the effect of an i.v. infusion of 0·9% saline (5 ml/h), somatostatin (SS, 4 or 8 µg/kg/h) or pretreatment with pirenzepine (PZ, 0·6 mg/kg i.v.), a muscarinic cholinergic antagonist which allegedly releases SS, on the GH release evoked by acute administration of GHRH (2 µg/kg i.v.), hexarelin (HEXA), a member of the GH-releasing peptide family (250 µg/kg i.v.) or GHRH plus HEXA.In fasted dogs, GHRH delivered during saline infusion induced a clear-cut rise in plasma GH levels, significantly higher than that which it induced in fed dogs. In contrast, HEXA, although very effective in causing the release of GH, only slightly increased GH secretion in fasted dogs over that which it induced in fed dogs. Co-administration of GHRH plus HEXA into fed dogs induced a synergic GH response that further increased with fasting.The action of GHRH in fed dogs was abolished by the lower dose of SS, whereas SS at either dose was ineffective in suppressing the GH-releasing effect during fasting. Infusion of the lower dose of SS failed to counter the action of HEXA, either before or during fasting, whilst the higher SS dose partially reduced it in both conditions.In contrast to SS, PZ reduced the GH-releasing effect of GHRH and HEXA, both in the fed state and, though to a lesser extent, during fasting. Pirenzepine only slightly reduced the robust GH rise elicited by GHRH plus HEXA in fed dogs. The suppressive effect of PZ on the GH response to combined administration of the peptides was lowest in fasted dogs.These data show that: (1) fasting augmented the GH response to GHRH and (to a lesser degree) to HEXA; (2) SS inhibited the GH response to GHRH in the fed state, but not in the fasted state; (3) only the higher dose of SS partially reduced the GH stimulation by HEXA in either the fed or the fasted state; (4) PZ lowered the GH response to GHRH and to HEXA in both the fed and (to a lesser degree) the fasted state; (5) PZ did not modify the GH release due to the combined administration of GHRH and HEXA.It is suggested that: (1) during fasting the greatly enhanced GH response to GHRH alone or GHRH plus HEXA probably reflects an augmented GHRH secretion; (2) somatotrope refractoriness to SS may contribute to the enhanced GH secretion in states of calorie deprivation; (3) in contrast to a general belief, muscarinic cholinergic antagonists, e.g. PZ, do not act exclusively via release of SS, but probably also through inhibition of GHRH function.

In this study we evaluated, in six young (5-7 year-old) beagle dogs, the effects of a 6-week administration of hexarelin (250 mg/kg s.c. twice daily) on the GH response to an acute challenge with hexarelin or GHRH (2 mg/kg i.v.), delivered before and after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. The GH peak response to acute hexarelin or GHRH initially increased, with a maximum observed at the 3rd week, and then decreased to basal values (GHRH) or less (hexarelin) at the 6th week. These data would indicate that hexarelin initially primed the pituitary to acute administration of further hexarelin or of GHRH, followed by downregulation of the GH response to hexarelin and preservation of the response to GHRH. We then studied the rebound increase in GH secretion after withdrawal of an infusion of somatostatin (4 mg/kg per h for 1.5 h), a likely stimulus of endogenous GHRH function. The pattern obtained was similar to, though not superimposable upon, that ensuing after acute hexarelin or GHRH administration. Parallel evaluation of the acute orexigenic effect of hexarelin evinced a different timecourse of the behavioural response, namely an acute feeding response to hexarelin that was abolished at the 3rd week and returned to normal at the 6th week. The differing timing of the neuroendocrine or behavioural response to hexarelin would suggest the existence of different subtypes of central nervous system GH-releasing peptide receptors.

GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs), a class of small synthetic peptide and non-peptide compounds, act on specific receptors at both the pituitary and the hypothalamic level to stimulate GH release in both humans and other animals. GHRPs, like corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), also possess acute ACTH-and cortisol-releasing activity, although the mechanisms underlying the stimulatory effect of GHRPs on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis are still unclear. In recent years, studies in humans and other animals have provided evidence that the rebound GH rise which follows withdrawal of an infusion of somatostatin (SS) (SSIW) is due, at least in part, to the functional activation of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) neurons of the recipient organism. Unexpectedly, in humans, SS infusion, at a dose inhibiting basal GH secretion, has been associated with an activation of the HPA axis, leading to the hypothesis that this response was mediated, at least in part, by a central nervous system ACTH-releasing mechanism activated by the SS-induced decrease in GH secretion. Interestingly, the rebound GH rise which follows SSIW was magnified by the administration, before SS withdrawal, of a GHRP, implying that the SSIW approach could also be exploited to investigate in vivo the functional interaction in the process of GH and/or ACTH/cortisol secretion between endogenous GHRH (and/or other ACTH-releasing mechanisms) and GHRPs.In the present study, six young beagle dogs were given, on different occasions, at the beginning and at the end of a 3-h i.v. infusion of SS or saline (SAL), a bolus of physiological SAL or a GHRP compound, EP51216.SSIW induced a GH rebound rise without affecting plasma cortisol concentrations, while the withdrawal of SAL infusion was ineffective on either hormone paradigm. Administration of EP51216 at the beginning of SAL infusion evoked release of both GH and cortisol, whereas EP51216 administration at the withdrawal of SAL infusion evoked somatotroph and cortisol responses which were reduced in amplitude and duration. SS infusion significantly reduced the secretion of GH elicited by EP51216 but did not affect the rise of plasma cortisol levels. Interestingly, SSIW resulted in a marked enhancement of the somatotroph and cortisol responses evoked by EP51216.The marked rise of plasma GH levels induced by the GHRP after SSIW recalled that occurring after acute combined administration of recombinant human GHRH and EP51216, implying that exogenously delivered GHRP had synergized with the endogenous GHRH release triggered by SSIW. In contrast, acute combined administration of GHRH and the GHRP induced a cortisol response not different from that induced by GHRP alone, indicating that endogenous GHRH release was not involved in the enhanced cortisol response following EP51216 administration after SSIW. Similarly, the direct involvement of endogenous CRH could be ruled out, since i.v. administration of ovine CRH after SSIW evoked cortisol peak levels not different from those evoked by CRH at the withdrawa...

No abstract

In this study we explored, in man, the effect of acute attenuation of growth hormone (GH) release induced by somatostatin (SRIH) on ACTH and cortisol plasma levels. Sixteen young (8 women, aged 23–32 years, and 8 men, aged 18–27 years) and 14 elderly (8 women, aged 65–82 years, and 6 men, aged 65–70 years) healthy subjects volunteered to participate in this investigation. Each subject was tested on two separate occasions by: (1) a 90-min i.v. infusion of SRIH given in 50 ml 0.9% saline delivered at a rate of 9 µg/kg/h, and (2) a 90-min i.v. infusion of isovolumetric amounts of 0.9% saline. Plasma GH, ACTH, cortisol and glucose concentrations were determined prior and up to 180 min after SRIH or saline infusion. SRIH induced a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in plasma GH levels from basal values of 0.6 ± 0.15 and 0.5 ± 0.15 µg/l to nadir values 0.25 ± 0.1 and 0.2 ± 0.1 µg/l in young and elderly subjects, respectively. The administration of SRIH was associated with a clear-cut increase in plasma ACTH levels both in young (peak, 10.6 ± 1.6 pmol/l; AUC, 558.6 ± 147.5 pmol/l/h) and in elderly (peak, 21.3 ± 5.6 pmol/l; AUC, 841.9 ± 153.8 pmol/l/h) subjects with a significant (p < 0.01) difference as compared to saline infusion. Consistent with these results, SRIH infusion resulted in an unequivocal rise in plasma cortisol levels both in young (peak, 394.8 ± 36.4 nmol/l; AUC, 18,591.62 ± 1,372.45 nmol/l/h) and in elderly (peak, 585.6 ± 51.5 nmol/l; AUC, 24,871.05 ± 1,837.03 nmol/l/h) subjects. The ACTH and cortisol responses to SRIH were significantly (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) higher in elderly than in young subjects. No sex-related differences occurred in the SRIH-induced activation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis. We conclude that (1) infusion of SRIH, at a dose that inhibited basal GH secretion, was associated with an activation of HPA axis, and (2) this response was higher in elderly individuals compared with younger adults. The reason for this novel and unexpected SRIH effect is presently unclear; however, the latter may be mediated, at least in part, by some central nervous system ACTH-releasing mechanisms activated by SRIH-induced decrease in GH secretion.