Purpose: To determine the pattern of refractive error among commercial drivers in north India. Methods: Descriptive study with convenient sampling conducted among commercial drivers of north India. Results: A total of 213 (75.8%) heavy-vehicle and 68 (24.2%) light-vehicle drivers were screened for eye diseases. Refractive error for distance was reported in 44 (15.7%; 95% CI: 11.6–20.4) drivers. Hyperopia was reported in 23 (8.2%; 95% CI: 5.2–12) drivers, followed by myopia in 15 (5.3%; 95% CI: 3–8.6) drivers and astigmatism in six (2.1%; 95% CI: 0.7–4.5) drivers. Presbyopia was reported in 157 (55.8%) drivers. Dry eye was reported in 70 (24.9%), stereo deficiency in 77 (27.4%), and color vision deficiency in 11 (3.9%) drivers. Three drivers were diagnosed with cataract, and two were referred for retina evaluation. Conclusion: Hyperopia in both eyes was the most common refractive error. Dry eye disease and color vision deficiency were also reported. Most of the drivers were not using spectacles for refractive error correction. Due to their mobile nature, drivers with cataract and retina diseases did not turn up for follow-up.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to measure the quality of life (QoL) in patients with glaucoma using the Glaucoma QoL-15 (GQL-15) questionnaire. Methods: A cross-sectional study with a prospective enrollment of glaucoma patients was conducted. A total of 308 patients were participated in the study. Informed consent was obtained before the administration of the GQL-15 questionnaire. The QoL was assessed using an orally administered GQL-15 questionnaire. Patients' QoL was assessed based on their age, gender, visual field (VF) defect, severity of glaucoma, laterality of disease, history of previous glaucoma surgery, and the number of antiglaucoma medications (AGMs) they were taking. Participants were divided into mild, moderate, and severe glaucoma depending on the severity of VF defects using the Hodapp–Anderson–Parrish grading system. Results: A total of 308 glaucoma patients were interviewed. The mean age of participants was 57.7 ± 12.9 years; 173 (56.1%) of them were female. The average mean deviation (MD) of the patients was 7.8 ± 4.8 dB. There were 135 (43.8%) patients with mild, 122 (39.6%) with moderate, and 51 (16.6%) with severe glaucoma. In total, 114 (37%) patients had unilateral glaucoma, whereas 138 (44.4%) patients had previous glaucoma surgery. Sixty-two (22.1%) patients did not take any AGM. The correlation coefficient between VF MD and QoL was 0.7, which was significant at 0.01 level (two-tailed). Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrated that the severity of VF defects has a negative impact on patient's QoL.
Purpose: To report outcome of trabeculectomy performed by single scleral suture in Indian eyes. Methods: Non-randomized, non-masked, retrospective cohort analysis. Medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent trabeculectomy between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2016 at CL Gupta Eye Institute, Moradabad (India), were reviewed and analyzed. Trabeculectomy was performed using single scleral suture for flap closure. The suture knot was buried inside sclera. The laser lysis of scleral suture was not done. Success was defined as complete success if an intraocular pressure (IOP) was >5 and ⩽21 mmHg without any glaucoma medications or re-surgery. Qualified success was defined as IOP ⩽21 mmHg with or without antiglaucoma medications. Results: Data of 98 patients was analyzed. A total of 61 (62.2%) of them underwent trabeculectomy, and 37 (37.7%) underwent phacotrabeculectomy. The probability of complete success in patient underwent phacotrabeculectomy was 86% at 3 years, and in-patient underwent only trabeculectomy was 95% at 3 years. The probability of qualified success in patient undergone phacotrabeculectomy was 91% at 3 years, and in patient undergone only trabeculectomy was 97% at 3 years. Conclusion: The mean postoperative IOP was significantly less then mean preoperative IOP, at all follow-up visits. This simplified technique also resulted in high midterm success probabilities with low complication rates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.