Migraine is considered to be a polygenic multifactorial disease with various environmental and genetic etiologies. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), a potent immunomodulator and pro-inflammatory cytokine, has been implicated in many pathological processes in brain. The hypothesis of this study was that migraine without aura (MWA) might be associated with TNF-alpha (-308) polymorphism, resulting in increased TNF-alpha production. Genotyping was performed on DNA extracted from peripheral leukocytes by PCR-SSP method in 221 patients with WMA and 183 healthy control subjects from Iranian population. The results showed that the frequency of -308 A variant allele was higher in MWA than in the control group (40.6% versus 22.3%, OR 3.73, 95% CI 2.4-5.82, p<0.0001). TNF-alpha GA heterozygous genotype, high producer, was significantly more prevalent in patients with MWA than controls (74% versus 44.7%, p<0.0001) whilst the low producer GG homozygous genotype was less frequent in patients compared with controls (22.4% versus 55.3%, p<0.0001). The logistic regression analysis showed a significant association for TNF-alpha (-308A) female allele carriers with MWA at reproductive ages (OR 2.56; 95% CI, 1.57-4.16, p<0.0001) when compared with their matched control subjects. In conclusion, this study demonstrates an association of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (-308A) carriage with MWA, suggesting that carrying a high responder TNF-alpha-308A allele may be a genetic factor in increasing the susceptibility to develop MWA.
BackgroundDespite the impact of sodium valproate and dexamethasone on migraine headache, the efficacy of the two drugs has not been properly investigated and compared. This trial compared the effect of the two drugs on acute migraine headache.MethodsThis double blind randomized clinical trial was conducted on patients aged 18 to 65 years with acute migraine headache who referred to the emergency departments of Beasat and Farshchian Hospitals in Hamadan, Iran, from April 2012 to June 2014. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a single-dose of either 400 mg sodium valproate or 16 mg dexamethasone plus 50 ml saline normal solution within 15 min intravenously. The severity of headache in the two groups was evaluated at baseline, 0.5 and 2 hours later using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 to 10.ResultsOf 104 patients enrolled, 72 patients remained for analysis. The effect of both sodium valproate and dexamethasone on acute migraine headache was statistically significant at 0.5 and 2 hours post-treatment compared to pre-treatment (P=0.001). The severity of headache based on VAS reduced form 8.20 (7.72, 8.68) before treatment to 5.31 (4.74, 5.89) and 3.66 (2.99, 4.33) at 0.5 and 2 hours after treatment, respectively, in patients receiving sodium valproate and from 8.46 (8.05, 8.86) before treatment to 5.46 (4.81, 6.11) and 3.59 (2.84, 4.35) at 0.5 and 2 hours after treatment, respectively, in patients receiving dexamethasone. Both drugs were highly effective in improvement of acute headache in patients without aura. However, sodium valproate significantly improved the acute headache in patients with aura but dexamethasone did not. The severity of headache based on VAS reduced form 8.50 (7.40, 9.60) before treatment to 4.67 (2.40, 6.93) and 3.50 (1.78, 5.22) at 0.5 and 2 hours after treatment, respectively, in patients with aura receiving sodium valproate and from 8.80 (7.76, 9.84) before treatment to 7.20 (4.98, 9.42) and 6.20 (2.43, 9.97) at 0.5 and 2 hours after treatment, respectively, in patients with aura receiving dexamethasone.ConclusionsThis trial indicated that, in overall, intravenous sodium valproate is not superior to intravenous dexamethasone in treatment of acute migraine attacks. However, in patients with aura, only sodium valproate but not dexamethasone is effective in headache relief. This issue needs further investigations.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov IRCT201202199014N1
Background and Objective: Evidence is indicative of the positive effect of citicoline administration in stroke patients; however, there are controversies over this issue. Regarding this, the present study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of citicoline in acute stroke patients. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 160 patients with hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups of intervention and control. The intervention group daily received 1 g citicoline injections for 10 days, in addition to the standard therapy. The baseline severity of the disease was determined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and the outcome of the disease was assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale and Barthel Index on the 1 st , 10 th , and 90 th days post-intervention. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata software (version 11.1). P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: According to the results, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, mean age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, hyperlipidemia, and mortality after stroke (P>0.05). Regardless of the type of stroke, the severity of the disease decreased over time in both groups. However, at the end of the study (the 90 th day), the intervention group had lower disease severity, compared to the control group (P<0.05). In terms of the ischemic stroke patients, the severity of the disease was significantly lower in the intervention group on the 90 th day, compared to that in the control group. Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, the use of citincoline in acute stroke patients exerted no significant effect in the disease treatment in the short term. However, the long-term administration of this medication could result in significant impacts on the treatment of the patients, especially those with ischemic stroke, and improvement of their efficacy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.