The correlation between the potency of inhaled anesthetics and their solubility in a hydrophobic phase provides an opportunity to define better the characteristics of the anesthetic site of action. The correlation implies that inhaled anesthetics act in a hydrophobic site and that the solvent used has properties representative of the true site of anesthetic action. We sought to characterize this site more accurately by testing for the solvent that provided the best correlation for a diverse group of anesthetics. We determined the solubility of halothane, enflurane, cyclopropane, fluroxene, isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane in benzene, olive oil, Intralipid, n-octanol, and lecithin. We used established MAC values for rats, dogs, and humans for all but sevoflurane and desflurane, for which we determined MAC in rats to be 2.80% +/- 0.24% (mean +/- standard deviation) and 7.71% +/- 0.65%, respectively. Lecithin gave the lowest coefficient of variation for the product of potency (MAC) x solubility, but the difference was statistically significant only for a comparison of the products for lecithin and olive oil. The values for lecithin were within the range of values produced by biological variation. More important, the correlation of log MAC and log solubility had an average slope of unity (-1.04 +/- 0.07) for lecithin, but a slope differing from unity for benzene (-0.82 +/- 0.05) and olive oil (-0.87 +/- 0.05). We conclude that lecithin is probably more representative of the site of action of these anesthetics than the other solvents.

The low solubility of sevoflurane in blood suggests that this agent should enter and leave the body more rapidly than isoflurane. However, the closeness of sevoflurane and isoflurane tissue/blood partition coefficients suggests that the rates of equilibration with and elimination from tissues should be similar. We tested both predictions, comparing sevoflurane with isoflurane and nitrous oxide in seven volunteers. We measured the rate at which the alveolar (end-tidal) (FA) concentration of nitrous oxide increased toward an inspired (FI) concentration of 65%-70%, then measured the concurrent rise in FA and mixed expired concentrations (FM) of sevoflurane and isoflurane at respective FI values of 1.0% sevoflurane and 0.6% isoflurane for 30 min. Minute ventilation (VE) was measured concurrently with the measurements of anesthetic concentrations. For the potent agents, we also measured VE, FA, and FM for 6-7 days of elimination. FA/FI values at 30 min of administration were as follows: nitrous oxide, 0.986 +/- 0.003 (mean +/- SD); sevoflurane, 0.850 +/- 0.018; and isoflurane, 0.733 +/- 0.027. FA/FA0 (FA0 = the last FA during administration) values after 5 min of elimination were as follows: sevoflurane, 0.157 +/- 0.020; isoflurane, 0.223 +/- 0.024. Recovery (volume of anesthetic recovered during elimination/volume taken up) of sevoflurane (101% +/- 7%) equaled recovery of isoflurane (101% +/- 6%). Time constants for a five-compartment mammillary model for sevoflurane were smaller than those for isoflurane for the lungs but were not different from isoflurane for the other compartments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)