Functionalized nanofibrous scaffolds with decellularized ECM (DECM) particles can mimic the natural motifs of cartilage ECMs and enhance chondro-inductivity for tissue engineering applications.
BackgroundThe thin and pliable skin of the neck is a region with multidirectional activity, and postburn scar contractures tend to form there easily. The supraclavicular flap is used to correct neck scar contractures. Its main vascular supply is the supraclavicular artery, and it can be harvested as either a skin pedicle flap or an island flap (vascular pedicle flap).ObjectiveIn this article, a total of 41 flaps are studied retrospectively and their efficacy in reconstruction of post-burn neck scar contractures is discussed. Also donor-site morbidity, patient satisfaction, and complications were evaluated.Patients and MethodsBetween November of 2004 and January of 2009, 41 supraclavicular flaps were used for reconstructions in 32 patients at the authors’ hospital. Twenty-four of these flaps were skin pedicle flaps, and 17 were island flaps. The range of flap size was 18 ± 6 cm in length, and 9 ± 3 cm in width. Pre-expansion was performed in 14 flaps. Primary closure of donor site was performed in 35 flaps.ResultsThirty-seven of the 41 flaps survived completely, but there were three cases of distal necrosis (10-30%), and one case of complete flap necrosis. Twenty-nine of the 32 patients were satisfied with both the functional and aesthetic results.ConclusionsScarring of the neck produces problems with function, and appearance. In our view, the supraclavicular flap, a thin flap of good texture, is an excellent and highly reliable flap for covering defects of the anterior neck. This flap is easy to harvest, with good functional and aesthetic results.
Background: Aesthetic and functional concerns, especially after multiple revision rhinoplasties, continue to provide a challenge even for the experienced surgeon. Objective: This study aimed to report the results in terms of “secondary rhinoplasty,” performed by the senior author after previous rhinoplasty. Methods: This descriptive prospective study was carried on 150 patients with surgical indication of secondary rhinoplasty and they were asked to fill out the questionnaire divided into 3 parts: overall epidemiological questions, questions of patients’ aesthetic and functional complaints, and objective evaluation by the surgeon. The nasal problems in the upper and middle regions were divided into high or low, broad or narrow, crooked, irregularity of nasal bridge, or other alterations. The patients included in the study had surgical programming of secondary rhinoplasty, with mandatory aesthetic and optional functional purposes, having previous rhinoplasty with the same or different surgeon. Results: There were 136 females and 14 males with the mean age of 31.52 (6.36) years. The most common complaints were related to the nose tip with 123 cases included deviated tip and pinched (bilateral) with 25.3%, 30.7%, and 25.3%, middle nose with 78 cases included mid vault deviation, inverted V, and polly beak with 31.3%, 18%, and 9.3%, and upper nasal region with 69 cases included dorsum irregularity and wide dorsum with the rates of 22.7% and 16.7%, respectively; respiratory problem was reported in 13 cases. Conclusion: Unilateral or bilateral twisting at the nasal tip had the highest percentages, and the lowest incidence was in relation to the complaints of the upper nasal part.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.