Background: The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) remains uncertain. We compared short-term (<6-month) DAPT followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy; mid-term (6-month) DAPT; 12-month DAPT; and extended-term (>12-month) DAPT after PCI with DES. Methods: Twenty-four randomized controlled trials were selected using Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, and online databases through September 2019. The co-primary endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI) and major bleeding, which constituted the net clinical benefit. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted with random effects model. Results: In 79,073 patients, at a median follow-up of 18 months, extended-term DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of MI compared with 12-month DAPT (absolute risk difference [ARD], -3.8 incident cases per 1000 person-years; relative risk (RR), 0.68 [95% CI, 0.54-0.87]), mid-term DAPT (ARD, -4.6 incident cases per 1000 person-years; RR, 0.61 [0.45-0.83]), and short-term DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy (ARD, -6.1 incident cases per 1000 personyears; RR, 0.55 [0.37-0.83]), or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (ARD, -3.7 incident cases per 1000 person-years; RR, 0.69 [0.51-0.95]). Conversely, extended-term DAPT was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared with all other DAPT groups. Compared with 12-month DAPT, no significant differences in the risks of ischemic endpoints or major bleeding were observed with mid-term or short-term DAPT followed by aspirin monotherapy, except that shortterm DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of major bleeding. There were no significant differences with respect to mortality between the different DAPT strategies. In acute coronary syndrome (ACS), extended-term compared with 12-month DAPT was associated with a reduced risk of MI without significant increase in the risk of major bleeding. Conclusions: The present network meta-analysis suggests that compared with 12-month DAPT, short-term DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy reduces major bleeding after PCI with DES, while extended-term DAPT reduces myocardial infarction at the expense of more bleeding events.
Benzocaine is a widely used topical oropharyngeal anesthetic and has been reported to cause methemoglobinemia. We discuss benzocaine-induced methemoglobinemia and review the causes, presentation, and management of this serious complication. Treatment with methylene blue will result in reversal of methemoglobinemia and clinical recovery in most cases but needs to be used at appropriate doses in carefully selected individuals. Physicians who perform procedures involving the application of benzocaine for topical anesthesia need to rapidly identify and treat methemoglobinemia to avoid significant associated morbidity and mortality.
Aims The effect of therapeutic lowering of apolipoprotein B (apoB) on mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events is uncertain. It is also unclear whether these potential effects vary by different lipid-lowering strategies. Methods A total of 29 randomized controlled trials were selected using PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE through 2018. We selected trials of therapies which ultimately clear apolipoprotein B particles by upregulating low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) expression (statins, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, bile acid sequestrants) or therapies which reduce apolipoprotein B independent of LDL-R (cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor, fibrates, niacin, omega-3 fatty acids) with sample size of ≥1000 patients and follow-up of ≥1 year. The meta-regression and meta-analyses were constructed using a random effects model. Results In 332,912 patients, meta-regression analyses showed relative risks of 0.95 for all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval 0.92–0.99) and 0.93 (0.88–0.98) for cardiovascular mortality for every 10 mg/dL decrease in apolipoprotein B by all interventions combined. Reduction in all-cause mortality was limited to statins (0.92 (0.86–0.98)). For MACE, the relative risk per 10 mg/dL reduction in apolipoprotein B was 0.93 (0.90–0.97) for all therapies combined, with both statin (0.88 (0.83–0.93)) and non-statin therapies (0.96 (0.94–0.99)). which clear apolipoprotein B by upregulating LDL-R showing significant reductions; whereas interventions which lower apolipoprotein B independent of LDL-R did not demonstrate this effect (1.02 (0.81–1.30)). Conclusion While both statin and established non-statin therapies (PCSK9 inhibitor and ezetimibe) reduced cardiovascular risk per decrease in apolipoprotein B, interventions which reduce apolipoprotein B independently of LDL-R were not associated with cardiovascular benefit.
Clostridium difficile (C diff) colitis infection is the most common cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea and the prevalence is increasing worldwide. Toxic megacolon is a severe complication of C diff colitis associated with high mortality. Gastrointestinal (GI) comorbidity and impaired smooth muscle contraction are risk factors for the development of C diff-associated toxic megacolon. We present a case of fulminant C diff colitis with toxic megacolon in a patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) in the intensive care unit. C diff colitis was diagnosed by clinical presentation and positive C diff DNA amplification test (polymerase chain reaction). The impairment of GI tract due to DMD predisposes these patients to severe C diff infection and toxic megacolon, as observed in this case report. For the same reason, the recovery of GI function in these patients can be prolonged. While surgery was conducted for relieving the pressure from toxic megacolon, fecal microbiota transplantation through colonoscopy resulted in successful resolution of the C diff symptoms, although the recovery is prolonged due to DMD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.