Given the superior measurement properties and the interval-level scores, the LVP-FVQ II appears to offer advantages over LVP-FVQ in assessment of difficulties in performing daily tasks in this population. It can be adapted for use in other developing countries.

BackgroundParents of a child with disability must cope with greater demands than those living with a healthy child. Coping refers to a person’s cognitive or behavioral efforts to manage the demands of a stressful situation. The Coping Health Inventory for Parents (CHIP) is a well-recognized measure of coping among parents of chronically ill children and assesses different coping patterns using its three subscales. The purpose of this study was to provide further insights into the psychometric properties of the CHIP subscales in a sample of parents of children with disabilities.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 220 parents (mean age, 33.4 years; 85% mothers) caring for a child with disability enrolled in special schools as well as in mainstream schools completed the 45-item CHIP. Rasch analysis was applied to the CHIP data and the psychometric performance of each of the three subscales was tested. Subscale revision was performed in the context of Rasch analysis statistics.ResultsResponse categories were not used as intended, necessitating combining categories, thereby reducing the number from 4 to 3. The subscale – ‘maintaining social support’ satisfied all the Rasch model expectations. Four item misfit the Rasch model in the subscale –maintaining family integration’, but their deletion resulted in a 15-item scale with items that fit the Rasch model well. The remaining subscale – ‘understanding the healthcare situation’ lacked adequate measurement precision (<2.0 logits).ConclusionsThe current Rasch analyses add to the evidence of measurement properties of the CHIP and show that the two of its subscales (one original and the other revised) have good psychometric properties and work well to measure coping patterns in parents of children with disabilities. However the third subscale is limited by its inadequate measurement precision and requires more items.

PURPOSE. We determined if the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) is a valid questionnaire to measure the vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in keratoconus patients, and investigated if the VRQoL varied with disease severity in this sample. METHODS.We recruited 160 consecutive bilateral keratoconus patients (mean age 23.3 years, 63% male) from an Indian tertiary eye care center. Participants underwent a clinical examination and completed the IVI. Participants were divided into three groups based on the average of the steep keratometry (K) readings: mild (average Sim K < 45 diopters [D]), moderate (average Sim K 45-52 D), and severe (average Sim K > 52 D). Rasch analysis was used to validate the IVI and the VRQoL scores thus obtained were compared across the disease groups.RESULTS. The majority (63%) of patients had severe, while the remainder (37%) had moderate keratoconus. Rasch analysis demonstrated the validity of the IVI to assess VRQoL through two subscales: vision-specific functioning (VF) and emotional well-being (EWB). There was no significant difference in VF (mean change À0.16, P ¼ 0.55) and EWB scores (mean change À0.32, P ¼ 0.23) between moderate and severe keratoconus groups.CONCLUSIONS. The revised IVI subscales have interval-level measurement properties, which support their suitability to measure VRQoL in this keratoconus sample. Patients with moderate or severe keratoconus had similar, but higher VRQoL scores as assessed by the revised IVI subscales, indicating lack of impact of the disease on their VRQoL. However, this does not exclude the possibility of finding an impact in other populations.

Glaucoma patients in India, especially those with severe VF loss, face significant challenges in performing daily tasks and in mobility. It is important to prevent progression such that activity limitation is minimized in glaucoma patients.