No abstract

OBJECTIVE Hemorrhage (also known as apoplexy) in optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) is rare. Because of the variable presentations and low incidence of OPG hemorrhages, little is known about their clinical course and the best treatment options. The aim of this work was to review risk factors, clinical course, and treatment strategies of optic glioma hemorrhages in the largest possible number of cases. METHODS A total of 34 patients were analyzed. Nine new cases were collected, and 25 were identified in the literature. Data regarding demographics, radiological and histological features, treatment, and outcome were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS The majority of patients were younger than 20 years. Only 3 patients were known to have neurofibromatosis. The histopathological diagnosis was pilocytic astrocytoma in the majority of cases. Five patients had intraorbital hemorrhages, whereas 29 patients had intracranial hemorrhage; the majority of intracranial bleeds were treated surgically. Six patients, all with intracranial hemorrhage, died due to recurrent bleeding, hydrocephalus, or surgical complications. No clear risk factors could be identified. CONCLUSIONS Intracerebral OPG hemorrhages have a fatal outcome in 20% of cases. Age, hormonal status, neurofibromatosis involvement, and histopathological diagnosis have been suggested as risk factors for hemorrhage, but this cannot be reliably established from the present series. The goals of surgery should be patient survival and prevention of further neurological and ophthalmological deterioration.

No abstract

PurposeMedulloblastoma (MB), the most common malignant brain tumor in children, is divided into four tumor subgroups: wingless-type (WNT), sonic hedgehog (SHH), Group 3, and Group 4. Ideally, clinical practice and treatment design should be subgroup specific. While WNT and SHH subgroups have well-defined biomarkers, distinguishing Group 3 from Group 4 is not straightforward. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), which regulate posttranscriptional gene expression, are involved in MB tumorigenesis. However, the miRNA–messenger RNA (mRNA) regulatory network in MB is far from being fully understood. Our aims were to investigate miRNA expression regulation in MB subgroups, to assess miRNA target relationships, and to identify miRNAs that can distinguish Group 3 from Group 4.Patients and methodsWith these aims, integrated transcriptome mRNA and miRNA expression analysis was performed on primary tumor samples collected from 18 children with MB, using miRNA sequencing (miRNA-seq), RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and quantitative PCR.ResultsOf all the expressed miRNAs, 19 appeared to be significantly differentially expressed (DE) between Group 4 and non-Group 4 subgroups (false discovery rate [FDR] <0.05), including 10 miRNAs, which, for the first time, are reported to be in conjunction with MB. RNA-seq analysis identified 165 genes that were DE between Group 4 and the other subgroups (FDR <0.05), among which seven are predicted targets of five DE miRNAs and exhibit inverse expression pattern.ConclusionThis study identified miRNA molecules that may be involved in Group 4 etiology, in general, and can distinguish between Group 3 and Group 4, in particular. In addition, understanding the involvement of miRNAs and their targets in MB may improve diagnosis and advance the development of targeted treatment for MB.