Background and objectiveTo systematically evaluate the clinical effects and safety of traditional Chinese medical bath therapy (TCMBT) combined with ultraviolet irradiation in the treatment of psoriasis.MethodsElectronic database retrieval was utilized. The foreign retrieval databases consulted included those of the Cochrane Library, PubMed and EMBASE; the domestic retrieval databases included the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (Sino-Med), the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP and the WangFang Database. Clinical randomized controlled trials were conducted to evaluate the effects of TCMBT combined with ultraviolet irradiation in the treatment of psoriasis; the language of the retrieved articles was Chinese or English. Each database was searched from its inception to August 1, 2015. Two researchers independently collected the data and analyzed the methodology of the documented literature. The researchers conducted a meta-analysis with RevMan 5.2.3 software.ResultsAccording to the available literature, 25 RCTs (randomized controlled trials) of low research quality were conducted. According to the meta-analysis, the total effective rate of TCMBT combined with ultraviolet irradiation was relatively higher than that of ultraviolet irradiation alone. The recurrence rate, incidence of adverse reactions and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) for the combined therapy was lower than that of ultraviolet irradiation (P<0.05).ConclusionFor the treatment of psoriasis, the clinical effects and safety of TCMBT combined with ultraviolet irradiation are generally better than those of ultraviolet irradiation alone. However, the original literature was written in Chinese, and the quality of the studies was not high. Thus, it is difficult to confirm the clinical effects and safety of TCMBT combined with ultraviolet irradiation. It is necessary to conduct a scientific, normalized and high-quality RCT with multiple large samples and centers.

Objective: The rs2479106 and rs10818854 polymorphisms in the DENND1A gene have been reported to be extensively associated with risk of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, the results from these studies remained inconclusive and conflicting. To detect a true association of rs2479106 and rs10818854 polymorphisms with PCOS risk, a single study may be underpowered, particularly for those studies with inadequate sample size. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of all available studies to explore this association.Methods: All studies published up to March 2015 on the association were identified by searching electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Studies containing available genotype frequencies of those 2 polymorphisms were chosen, and the odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated using fixed- or random- effects models.Results: A total of 8 studies about s2479106 polymorphism (8185 cases and 28675 controls) and 5 studies about rs10818854 polymorphism (6638 cases and 27443 controls) met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Overall, significant increase of PCOS risk was found between DENND1A-rs10818854 and PCOS susceptibility. In addition, we also found an increased risk of PCOS in rs2479106 allele model, heterozygote variant genetic model, and dominant genetic model.Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggested that rs2479106 and rs10818854 polymorphisms in the DENND1A gene were associated with increased risk of PCOS. To validate the association between these polymorphisms and PCOS susceptibility, further large and well-designed studies are needed.