Objectives To assess urinary and reproductive health and quality of life following surgical repair of obstetric fistula.Design Follow-up study.Setting A newly established fistula clinic (2004) at Gimbie Adventist Hospital, a 71-bedded district general hospital in West Wollega Zone, in rural Western Ethiopia.Population Thirty-eight women (86%) of 44 who had undergone fistula repair were identified in their community.Methods Community-based structured interviews 14-28 months following fistula repair, using a customised questionnaire addressing urinary health, reproductive health and quality of life.Main outcome measures Urinary health at follow up was assessed as completely dry, stress or urge incontinence, or fistula. King's Health Questionnaire was modified and used for the quality-oflife assessment.Results At follow up, 21 women (57%) were completely dry, 13 (35%) suffered from stress or urge incontinence and three (8%) had a persistent fistula. Surgery improved quality of life and facilitated social reintegration to a level comparable to that experienced before fistula development for both women who were dry and those with residual incontinence (P = 0.001). For women still suffering from fistula no change was seen (P = 0.1). Four women became pregnant following their surgery, among which there was one maternal death, three stillbirths and one re-occurrence of fistula.Conclusion Community-based, long-term follow up after fistula repair succeeded in Western rural Ethiopia. Despite one-third still suffering stress or urge incontinence, the women reported improved quality of life and social reintegration after fistula closure.Keywords Quality of life, long term follow-up, obstetric fistula, outcomes.Please cite this paper as: Nielsen H, Lindberg L, Nygaard U, Aytenfisu H, Johnston O, Sørensen B, Rudnicki M, Crangle M, Lawson R, Duffy S. A community-based long-term follow up of women undergoing obstetric fistula repair in rural Ethiopia.

No abstract

No abstract

We evaluated the impact of the World Health Organization Obstetric Safe Surgery Checklist (WHO Checklist) on perioperative communication between anaesthetists and obstetricians by performing a retrospective audit in a Teaching hospital in London, UK. Caesarean section births from February to March 2009 and April to May 2011 were studied. Caesarean section notes from obstetricians and anaesthetists managing the same woman during the study period were reviewed. Grading differences between obstetricians and anaesthetists before and after checklist introduction were evaluated. Communication failure (where obstetricians and anaesthetists had documented different caesarean section grades [level of urgency]) and good communication (where obstetricians and anaesthetists had documented the same caesarean section grade) were observed. In total, 195 caesarean sections before introduction of the WHO safe surgery checklist and 194 caesarean sections after checklist introduction were studied. Grading differences occurred in 24.1% of caesarean sections without checklists compared with 10.3% with checklists (P < 0.001). During emergency caesarean section alone, grading differences between obstetricians and anaesthetists were smaller, although this was not significant (P = 0.222). We conclude that implementation of a WHO Obstetric Safe Surgery checklist improves the communication of caesarean section grade (urgency) between obstetricians and anaesthetists.

The delivery room logbook entries of Gimbie Adventist Hospital for a period of one month were monitored and compared with the actual number of births recorded on a separate worksheet for that period. The implications of the missing data were reviewed. This data was compared to a previous audit of the same design. Eighty per cent of births were recorded during this one month period which reflected an improvement from 72% reported in a previous study. Underreporting resulted in discrepencies when calculating the number of births and signal functions such as caesarean section rates, blood transfusion, administration of parenteral anticonvulsants and removal of retained products. In turn, these discrepencies impact the calculation of process indicators of safe motherhood projects. The reliability of the delivery room logbook as the sole source of information to create health policy and to monitor and evaluate health programs is questionable.