Identifying where and when population ‘bottlenecks’ occur is critical to the conservation of migratory species, many of which are declining precipitously worldwide. Especially challenging is the evaluation of changes to staging sites. These sites are indispensable links in the migratory cycle but are typically used only briefly. We devised a field‐based approach to assess the quality and carrying capacity of a critical staging site in Nanpu, China, for the declining, migratory Red Knot (Calidris canutus rogersi & C. c. piersmai) during northward migration. The Nanpu tidal flat supports 50,000–100,000 Red Knots annually, and while there, the knots feed almost exclusively on the bivalve Potamocorbula laevis. We simultaneously monitored changes in the abundance of Red Knots and bivalves across this entire staging site in spring 2018. After taking into account potential competition with other shorebird species, we estimated that the Nanpu tidal flat was capable of supporting approximately 1.46–1.70 times the observed level of Red Knot usage of this site, and therefore is operating below, but close to, carrying capacity with respect to food resources for Red Knots. This result suggests that any further habitat loss or degradation at this site could harm the Red Knot population along the entire East Asian‐Australasian Flyway. Synthesis and applications. Quantitative monitoring and evaluation of habitat quality of staging sites are essential to successfully conserve declining migratory species. In particular, researchers and conservation practitioners should incorporate both population size and staging duration to more accurately assess the importance of different sites and to quantify how changes in staging habitat quality may translate into changes in the population sizes of migratory species at both local and global scales.
Understanding species distribution patterns and what determines them is critical for effective conservation planning and management. In the case of shorebirds migrating along the East Asian‐Australasian Flyway (EAAF), the loss of stopover habitat in the Yellow Sea region is thought to be the primary reason for alarming declines in shorebird populations. However, the rates of decline vary considerably among species, and it remains unclear how such differences could arise within a group of closely related species using apparently similar habitats at the same locales. We sampled and mapped the spatial distributions of both biotic (benthic invertebrates consumed by migrating shorebirds) and abiotic (sediment characteristics) environmental factors at a key stopover site in eastern China. We found that both benthic invertebrates and sediment characteristics demonstrated considerable spatial heterogeneity across the same tidal flat, with most benthic invertebrates concentrated on the upper and/or middle zones of the tidal flat, the area with finer‐grained sediments. Moreover, the distribution patterns of focal shorebird species on the tidal flat were best explained jointly by these biotic and abiotic environmental factors. We show that the same stretch of tidal flat can exhibit considerable heterogeneity with respect to the distributions of both shorebirds and environmental factors. The loss of tidal flats along the Yellow Sea is typically concentrated at the upper and middle zones, which not only reduces the overall amount of staging habitat, but also disproportionately affects the most resource‐rich portions for the birds. Effective conservation measures for shorebird staging areas along the EAAF and likely elsewhere must take into account the subtle habitat heterogeneity that characterizes these tidal flats, prioritizing the protection of those portions of the tidal flat that are richest in food resources, most frequently used by focal bird species, and most vulnerable to anthropogenic threats.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.