Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer affecting women in the United States. Triple-negative breast cancer remains the most aggressive molecular subtype secondary to a lack of therapeutic targets. The search for a target has led us to investigate immunotherapeutic agents. Immunotherapy has recently demonstrated significant breakthroughs in various types of cancers that are refractory to traditional therapies including melanoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Breast cancer however remains one of the tumors that was initially least investigated because of being considered to have a low immunogenic potential and a low mutational load. Over the past few years, antiPD1/PDL1 drugs have started to make progress in the triple-negative subtype with more promising outcomes. In this report, we review the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer and specifically shed light on advances in immunotherapy and newly approved drugs in this challenging disease.

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, and postoperative breast pain has been reported to be anywhere from 25% to 60%. However, there is sparse data regarding racial/ethnic differences in breast pain among breast cancer patients. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional anonymous survey of breast cancer patients from the Hawaii Cancer Consortium over a 6-week period between 2019 and 2020. The 237 breast cancer participants were ages 29 to 98, 74% Asian, and mainly from outpatient oncology clinics. We evaluated the prevalence of breast pain in a diverse group of breast cancer patients and characterized the pain using a modified short-form McGill pain questionnaire (sfMPQ). Results: Eighty-fourrespondents(35.4%) reported breast pain. On univariable analysis, we found significant racial/ethnic differences in the amount of breast pain, where Chinese and Japanese participants reported significantly less pain compared to White participants on a 10-point pain scale. We found differences in breast pain according to age and endocrine therapy use as well as survey location, however, no differences were seen according to chemotherapy, radiation, or breast surgery. Based on the sfMPQ, the most common descriptors of breast pain were sensory (throbbing, shooting, and stabbing) compared to affective (tiring-exhausting, sickening, fearful, and punishing-cruel) characteristics. Although they were described as mild and intermittent, in women with breast pain, 33.4% reported the breast pain affected their sleep, 16.7% their work, and 15.4% their sexual activity. Conclusions: Breast pain is a significant problem in our breast cancer community. This survey assessment has informed our understanding of breast pain in our diverse population. In turn, we are developing culturally appropriate pain management strategies to treat this challenging symptom common in breast cancer survivors.

e12500 Background: Evidence has linked weight gain and obesity to increased breast cancer risk, poorer outcomes, decreased survivorship, and increased risk of recurrence. Adjuvant therapies can increase weight gain, making tailored exercise interventions beneficial in maintaining a healthy weight. In this study, body composition changes were examined after a 12-week exercise program in a cohort of breast cancer survivors. Methods: The Breast Cancer Exercise Rehabilitation Research Study recruited breast cancer survivors to undergo a 12-week exercise program (NCT04013568) and examine body composition changes. Measurements taken included anthropometry (waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, BMI), DXA body composition measurements (fat mass-visceral and subcutaneous, trunk to limb, muscle mass-appendicular, and whole body), and BIA (Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis-muscle, fat, and water). 34 participants completed the exercise program and baseline and post-12-week measurements were obtained. Descriptive statistics and a paired t-test analysis was done to analyze changes in body composition using SAS onDemand. A correlation analysis between measurements simple to do in clinic and DXA measurements were run to determine proxy use for DXA. Results: After a 12-week exercise program, reductions in body fat via DXA scan, BIA, and InBody (whole body fat, whole body fat %, trunk fat, leg fat, body fat %, hip width at maximum girth, body fat mass, and percent body fat) were observed. Additionally, increases in lean mass (Appendicular Lean Mass (ALM)/height2, Appendicular Lean/height2, ALM index, and lean body mass), whole body mass measured by DXA, basal metabolic rate, water retention (extracellular water and total body water), and skeletal muscle mass were observed. Correlation analysis revealed BMI can be used as a surrogate measure for whole body mass measured by DXA (r=0.91, p<0.001) and can be utilized to measure change over time. Skinfold sum showed moderate correlation for measuring subcutaneous fat mass by DXA (r=0.45, p=0.0096). Conclusions: In our population of breast cancer survivors, a 12-week exercise program did show various changes in body composition according to InBody, DXA, and BIA measurements. DXA and InBody measurements were feasible, making it readily available for patients. Additionally, simple measures such as BMI and skinfold sum showed moderate to strong correlation with DXA measurements, validating use of these measurements in routine practice. Clinical trial information: NCT04013568. [Table: see text]