Successful scale-up of PrEP for HIV prevention in African adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) requires integration of PrEP into young women’s everyday lives. We conducted interviews and focus group discussions with 137 AGYW PrEP users aged 16–25 from South Africa and Kenya. Individual and relational enablers and disablers were explored at key moments during their PrEP-user journey from awareness, initiation and early use through persistence, including PrEP pauses, restarts, and discontinuation. PrEP uptake was facilitated when offered as part of an integrated sexual reproductive health service, but hampered by low awareness, stigma and misconceptions about PrEP in the community. Daily pill-taking was challenging for AGYW due to individual, relational and structural factors and PrEP interruptions (intended or unintended) were described as part of AGYW’s PrEP-user journey. Disclosure, social support, adolescent-friendly health counseling, and convenient access to PrEP were reported as key enablers for PrEP persistence.

male condoms applied using finger, female condoms vaginally inserted using fingers, both used during sex.  Oral Pills: orally administered, used daily (one tablet at around the same time every day).  Implants: flexible plastic rods placed under the skin of the upper arm, inserted every 3-5 years.  Injectable: a shot that contains hormones that stop your body from releasing eggs and thickens the mucus at the cervix, received once every 1-3 months from a healthcare provider.  Vaginal Gel/Spermicide: a chemical in the form of a cream, film, foam, gel or suppository that is vaginally administered before sex. Pregnancy Prevention only: Diaphragm: a shallow, dome-shaped silicone cup with a flexible rim that is inserted into the vagina prior to sex.  IUD: a small contraceptive device, often 'T'-shaped, that is inserted into the uterus, effective for 3-10 years. Male and female sterilization: a permanent form of contraception. Female sterilization involves cutting, sealing, or blocking the fallopian tubes, which carry an egg to the womb. Male sterilization includes cutting, sealing, or tying the tube that carries the sperm to the testicles.  Traditional/rhythm method: traditional methods of contraception include abstinence, withdrawal, and rhythm methods. The rhythm method, also known as the calendar method works by tracking a woman's menses and predicting the times when a woman is fertile and avoiding unprotected sex during those times.

No abstract

Introduction There is limited understanding of how social dynamics impact pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in generalized HIV-epidemic settings. We examined experiences of oral PrEP use disclosure to various social groups with the goal of identifying supportive relationships that can be leveraged to promote adherence. Methods We used qualitative methods to explore experiences disclosing PrEP use and the perceived impact of disclosure on adherence among 22 South African AGYW (16–25 years) taking daily oral PrEP. Serial in-depth-interviews (IDIs) were conducted 1-, 3-, and 12-months post-PrEP initiation. Respondents also self-reported their disclosures separately for various social groups and adherence was assessed using intracellular tenofovir-diphosphate levels. Results Qualitative respondents had a median age of 20.5 years and reported disclosing their PrEP use to friends (n = 36 total disclosures), partners, siblings, other family members (n = 24 disclosures each), and parents (n = 19 disclosures). IDI data revealed that parents and partners provided the most support to respondents and a lack of support from these groups was most often perceived as negatively affecting PrEP use. AGYW described difficulties explaining PrEP to their mothers, who believed PrEP was HIV treatment or would lead to HIV infection. Disclosure to household members was notably meaningful for AGYW (both positively and negatively). Respondents reported leveraging supportive relationships for pill reminders. For respondents who perceived a household member would be unsupportive, however, non-disclosure was less feasible and PrEP use was often stigmatized. To avoid stigma, several respondents hid or discontinued PrEP. Conclusions While supportive relationships may facilitate PrEP use, disclosure can also lead to stigma. Counselors should support AGYW in disclosing to key people in their social networks and provide AGYW with materials that lend credibility to explanations of PrEP. Community education is necessary to alleviate PrEP-related stigma and facilitate disclosure.

Implants are in the pre-clinical stage for long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), with an opportunity to solicit end-users' feedback early in development. Health care providers (HCPs) have been key gatekeepers for contraceptive implant uptake, and uniquely understand both technical considerations and the social context of use. Given their influential role, we gathered South African HCP perspectives on contraceptive implant implementation and features of PrEP implant prototypes that may influence future provider and patient acceptability. We conducted in-depth interviews with 30 HCPs (20 nurses and 10 doctors) in Cape Town and Soshanguve, South Africa. Interviews were conducted by a bioengineer and later transcribed, coded, and analyzed for key themes. HCPs described health system barriers such as understaffed clinics and inadequate training on contraceptive implant removal as major influences to their PrEP implant design preferences. They preferred a PrEP implant that is long lasting (>6 months) to minimize patient-clinic interactions, biodegradable to avoid need for removal, and flexible (but still palpable in case of removal). Commenting on negative experiences with contraceptive implant rollout, they recommended prioritizing both HCP and community education on the PrEP implant, with emphasis on expected side effects, and planning ahead for adequate training of HCPs before rollout. Challenges experienced with past contraceptive implant rollout may taint perspectives on future PrEP implants and must be carefully considered during product development and planning for clinical studies. Particular consideration should be given to the health system context of future distribution, including staff who would be providing and monitoring implants.