Data supporting the concept that microbial biofilms are a major cause of non-healing ulcers remain limited. A porcine model was established where delayed healing resulted from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in full-thickness wounds. At the end of one study a wound remaining open was sampled and a MRSA strain was isolated. This pig-passaged strain was used as the inoculating strain in several subsequent studies. The resulting MRSA wound infections exhibited a greater, more stable tissue bioburden than seen in studies using the parent strain. Furthermore, wounds infected with the passaged strain experienced a greater delay in healing. To understand whether these changes corresponded to an increased biofilm character of the wound infection, wound biopsy samples from studies using either the parent or passaged MRSA strains were examined microscopically. Evidence of biofilm was observed for both strains, as most samples at a minimum had multiple isolated, dense microcolonies of bacteria. However, the passaged MRSA resulted in bacterial colonies of greater frequency and size that occurred more often in concatenated fashion to generate extended sections of biofilm. These results provide a model case in which increasing biofilm character of a wound infection corresponded with a greater delay in wound healing.
Examination of clinical samples indicates bacterial biofilms are present in the majority of chronic wounds, and substantial evidence suggests biofilms contribute significantly to delayed healing. Bacteria in biofilms are highly tolerant of antimicrobials, and little data exist to guide the choice of anti-biofilm wound therapy. Cadexomer iodine (CI) was recently reported to have superior efficacy compared to diverse wound dressings against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in an ex vivo model. In the current study, the strong performance of CI vs. P. aeruginosa biofilm was confirmed using colony and colony drip-flow in vitro wound biofilm models. Similar in vitro efficacy of CI was also demonstrated against mature Staphylococcus aureus biofilms using the same models. Additionally, the rapid kill of mature S. aureus and P. aeruginosa colony biofilms was visualized by confocal microscopy using Live/Dead fluorescent stains. Superior in vitro efficacy of CI vs. staphylococcal biofilms was further demonstrated against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) using multiple biofilm models with log reduction, Live/Dead, and metabolic endpoints. Comparator antimicrobial dressings, including silver-based dressings used throughout and other active agents used in individual models, elucidated only limited effects against the mature biofilms. Given the promising in vitro activity, CI was tested in an established mouse model of MRSA wound biofilm. CI had significantly greater impact on MRSA biofilm in mouse wounds than silver dressings or mupirocin based on Gram-stained histology sections and quantitative microbiology from biopsy samples (>4 log reduction in CFU/g vs. 0.7-1.6, p < 0.0001). The superior efficacy for CI in these in vitro and in vivo models suggests CI topical products may represent a better choice to address established bacterial biofilm in chronic wounds.
A wound biofilm model was created by adapting a superficial infection model. Partial-thickness murine wounds were inoculated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Dense biofilm communities developed at the wound surface after 24 h as demonstrated by microscopy and quantitative microbiology. Common topical antimicrobial agents had reduced efficacy when treatment was initiated 24 h after inoculation compared to 4 h after inoculation. This model provides a rapid in vivo test for new agents to treat wound biofilm infections.
Introduction The future multi-domain battlefield will require prolonged care in theater with evacuation delays of up to seven days. This creates a great risk of infection by not removing any necrotic tissue from burns in a timely manner. Products that can provide non-surgical debridement (NSD) prior to definitive care are essential. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel protease (SN514) as a potential NSD agent on deep partial (DPT) and full thickness (FT) burn wounds in a pig and on discarded human skin. Methods On day -4, twenty DPT and FT 3 cm diameter burn wounds were created on the dorsum of 8 anesthetized Yorkshire pigs using appropriate pain control methods. Burns were treated daily from day 0 to day 4 with one of five treatment groups: 1) no treatment, 2) collagenase, 3) 0.5% SN514, 4) 1.0% SN514, or 5) hydrogel vehicle. The wounds were assessed every day, rinsed with 4% chlorohexidine and sterile water, digital and laser speckle images (LSI) were acquired, the treatments reapplied, and then rebandaged. Biopsy strips were harvested across the middle of wounds on day 3 or 4. Samples were paraffin embedded, sectioned, stained with H&E and Masson’s trichrome, and imaged. For the human skin cohort, an abdominoplasty sample was burned to create FT burns. Burned and unburned samples were treated daily with SN514 for up to 4 days. Results During the daily assessment, SN514 treated wounds appeared more debrided than controls. No bleeding, infection, inflammation, or redness were observed. LSI detected significant increases in the perfusion status of SN514 treated wounds for the DPT burns on day 4. Histological analysis indicated a greater debridement of the porcine burn wounds for SN514. Treatment of human burned tissue with SN514 resulted in an 80% weight reduction compared to untreated samples. Conclusions SN514 treatment removed significant amounts of necrotic tissue from DPT and FT burns. SN514 achieved this in the absence of blood loss, without harming adjacent normal skin, and may have potentiated the wounds to allow healing to begin. The observed increase in perfusion after treatments suggests that the wound bed was optimal for spontaneous healing or a temporary covering. Application of SN514 on the burned human tissue successfully debrided both the dermis and hypodermis. Applicability of Research to Practice The ultimate aim is to identify NSD products for prolonged care scenarios that are easy to use, safe, and may improve healing of burns without the need for surgical debridement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.