Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest malignancies among all cancers. Despite curative intent, surgery and the use of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation therapy, PDAC remains treatment-resistant. In recent years, more contemporary treatment modalities such as immunotherapy via checkpoint inhibition have shown some promise in many other malignancies, yet PDAC still eludes an effective curative treatment. In investigating these phenomena, research has suggested that the significant desmoplastic and adaptive tumor microenvironment (TME) of PDAC promote the proliferation of immunosuppressive cells and act as major obstacles to treatment efficacy. In this review, we explore challenges associated with the treatment of PDAC, including its unique immunosuppressive TME. This review examines the role of surgery in PDAC, recent advances in surgical approaches and surgical optimization. We further focus on advances in immunotherapeutic approaches, including checkpoint inhibition, CD40 agonists, and discuss promising immune-based future strategies, such as therapeutic neoantigen cancer vaccines as means of overcoming the resistance mechanisms which underly the dense stroma and immune milieu of PDAC. We also explore unique signaling, TME and stromal targeting via novel small molecule inhibitors, which target KRAS, FAK, CCR2/CCR5, CXCR4, PARP and cancer-associated fibroblasts. This review also explores the most promising strategy for advancement in treatment of pancreatic cancer by reviewing contemporary combinatorial approaches in efforts to overcome the treatment refractory nature of PDAC.

Despite advances in cancer therapeutics, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains among the deadliest malignancies, with a poor prognosis at time of diagnosis. Research in PDAC has suggested that adaptive signaling in the tumor microenvironment may promote tumor proliferation and survival. Several FGFR fusion genes—specifically FGFR2—are involved with the creation and progression of cancer. These mutations are found in a variety of cancer types. This report presents a unique case of a young patient with stage IV PDAC with a known FGFR2 fusion. This molecular alteration afforded a remarkable response to FGFR inhibitor therapy, erdafitinib, after the patient experienced disease progression on multiple chemotherapy regimens.

In this phase I dose-escalation trial, we assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Bermekimab in combination with Nanoliposomal Irinotecan (Nal-Iri) and 5-Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid (5-FU/FA). Secondarily, we investigate effects on weight, lean body mass, quality-of-life, the gut microbiome composition, inflammatory biomarkers, progression-free survival, and overall survival. This was a single-arm, open-label adaptive Bayesian dose-escalation study of Bermekimab combined with Nal-Iri and 5FU/FA in patients with advanced or locally advanced PDAC who failed gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. 22 patients enrolled between 2017 and 2019. 3 of 21 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities attributable to the chemotherapy backbone. 58% (10/17) of patients exhibited weight stability. Physical performance status was preserved among all subjects. Patients reported improvements in quality-of-life metrics via QLQ-PAN26 questioner (−3.6, p = 0.18) and functional well-being (1.78, p = 0.02). Subjects exhibited a decrease in inflammatory cytokines, notably, vascular endothelial growth factor (−0.86, p = 0.017) with Bermekimab. Bermekimab treatment was associated with an increased abundance of gut health-promoting bacterial genera Akkermansia, with 3.82 Log2-fold change from baseline. In sum, Bermekimab is safe to be used in conjunction with Nal-Iri and 5-FU/FA chemotherapy. This benign toxicological profile warrants further Phase I/II investigation of Bermekimab in combinatorial strategies, and the impact of anti-IL-1α antibodies on the gut microbiome.Clinical trials registration: NCT03207724 05/07/2017.

4031 Background: Expression of the immune modulating proteins, programmed death receptor-1 (PD1) and its ligand (PDL1), in gastrointestinal malignancies is associated with poor prognosis. PD1/PDL1 expression levels have also been identified as predictors of response to checkpoint inhibition. Minimal data is available on how expression of PD1 and PDL1 is influenced by chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In this study, we investigated the relationship between PDL1/PD1 expression, CRT, and clinical outcomes in gastroesophageal (GE) cancer. Methods: With IRB approval, we identified 28 patients with gastric cardia or GE junction tumors who underwent neoadjuvant standard CRT followed by surgical resection. Pre-CRT biopsies and post-CRT surgical specimens were analyzed using quantitative immunohistochemistry for the expression of PDL1 and PD1. Samples were categorized as trace-low (TL) or moderate-high (MH) expressors of PDL1 and PD1. The impact of these and other clinical and pathologic variables on overall survival (OS) was assessed using multivariate cox proportional hazards modeling. Co-expression of PDL1 and PD1 in matched samples was determined by regression analysis. Results: Following CRT, PDL1 and PD1 expression increased in 54% and 32% of patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, patients with MH expression of PD1 after CRT irrespective of pre-CRT expression levels had a significant decrease in OS compared to those with TL expression (median survival 23.1 vs 74.1 months; HR,3.31; CI,1.05-10.35; p = 0.039). In patients with gastric confined tumors, an increase in PD1 expression from TL to MH after CRT was associated with significantly lower OS rates (p = 0.003). Regression analysis of PD1 to PDL1 was significant (p < 0.01) both before and after CRT, with a correlation coefficient of 0.34 in pre-CRT and 0.49 in post-CRT specimens. Conclusions: Elevated expression of PD1 is associated with poor OS in patients with GE cancer. Neoadjuvant CRT upregulates both PDL1 and PD1. In gastric cancer patients, this led to significantly worse survival. These data identify potential mechanisms of resistance and suggest a role for checkpoint inhibitors in combination with CRT.

520 Background: Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis and a 5-year survival rate of 10%. A population-risk level analysis of pancreatic cancer will identify epidemiologic risk factors including geographic, racial, ethnic, and sex inequities which could lead to improved prevention strategies. Methods: Incidence data for invasive pancreatic cancer from 2009 through 2018 was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Research (SEER) Plus Limited-Field database (SEER 21) that covers about 37% of the US population. Age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIR) and trends were estimated by race, sex, age categories (ten-year age groups starting from age 30), and county-level rural-urban classification developed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Trends over the period are described using the annual percent change (APC) calculated using weighted least squares method. Results: Overall pancreatic cancer incidence (per 100,000 population) for all ages during 2009-2018 was 13.0. Rates were highest among Black (15.4), followed by non-Hispanic white (13.2) and Hispanic (11.6) groups in both men and women. Males carries a higher rate of incidence (14.8) than females (11.6) in pancreatic cancer although both sexes experienced a 0.6% increase in incidence yearly. Incidence of pancreatic cancer increased with age across all ethnicities in men and women. The highest rate of incidence was found in ages 80 and above (99.5) and the lowest in age group 30-39 (1.0). Pancreatic cancer rates increased by 0.6% yearly and increased in every racial/ethnic group for both males and females, except Black males (0.0) and American Indian/Alaska Native females (-0.2). Although incidence in urban counties (13.1, n = 321) and rural counties (12.8, n = 411) was comparable, rural countries observed a faster increase in rates between 2009 and 2018 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Incidence of pancreatic cancer has increased from 2009 to 2018 across all ethnicities and in both men and women. Minorities, males, and individuals living in rural counties are disproportionately affected by pancreatic cancer. Additionally, older individuals have a higher incidence of pancreatic cancer, suggesting an increased risk in this patient population. This data will inform strategies to identify high-risk populations and implement preventative care, screening, and surveillance.[Table: see text]