In-situ and extra abdominal repair of uterine wound during cesarean section are two valid approaches. This study was carried out to compare intra operative and post operative morbidity in women undergoing caesarean delivery using these two techniques. This is a prospective interventional randomized controlled study. The study subjects include 170 women undergoing Lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) at Southern Railway HQ hospital, Chennai. Intra operative and post operative parameters were analysed in all the study subjects. In in-situ group, 12.6 % women experienced intra operative pain and 30.1% women in extra abdominal group. Intra operative nausea and vomiting was seen in 16.1% women in in-situ group and 28.9% women in extra abdominal group. 1.1% women in in-situ had post-operative febrile morbidity and 8.4 % had in extra abdominal group. The median fall in haemoglobin was 1.30 g/dL and 1.40 g/dL in in-situ and extra abdominal group respectively. In-situ repair of the uterine wound at cesarean delivery is associated with lesser incidence of intra operative pain , intra operative nausea or vomiting and post operative febrile morbidity compared to extra abdominal repair technique.

Objectives In this study, we tried to make the customized labor curve by studying the labor pattern among the primigravidas and we compared the cervicograph with Zhang's and Suzuki's curves. This study may be a motivator for future research to create own labor norms for our Indian population which may help in reducing the cesarean section rates, principally in primigravidas. Materials and Methods It was a prospective observational study, which included 156 primigravidas with uncomplicated term singleton pregnancy with spontaneous onset and progression of labor, who had normal vaginal delivery with good maternal and neonatal outcome. Results The shape of the labor curve of this study was similar to Zhang' and Suzuki-Horiuchi's curves which had slower progression. The active phase started from 5 to