Background
Retrospective multicenter research using echocardiograms obtained for routine clinical care can be hampered by issues of individual center quality. We sought to evaluate imaging and patient characteristics associated with poorer quality of archived echocardiograms from a cohort of childhood cancer survivors.
Methods
A single blinded reviewer at a central core laboratory graded quality of clinical echocardiograms from five centers focusing on images to derive 2D and M‐mode fractional shortening (FS), biplane Simpson's ejection fraction (EF), myocardial performance index (MPI), tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)–derived velocities, and global longitudinal strain (GLS).
Results
Of 535 studies analyzed in 102 subjects from 2004 to 2017, all measures of cardiac function could be assessed in only 7%. While FS by 2D or M‐mode, MPI, and septal E/E′ could be measured in >80% studies, mitral E/E′ was less consistent (69%), but better than EF (52%) and GLS (10%). 66% of studies had ≥1 issue, with technical issues (eg, lung artifact, poor endocardial definition) being the most common (33%). Lack of 2‐ and 3‐chamber views was associated with the performing center. Patient age <5 years had a higher chance of apex cutoff in 4‐chamber views compared with 16‐35 years old. Overall, for any quality issue, earlier era of echo and center were the only significant risk factors.
Conclusion
Assessment of cardiac function using pooled multicenter archived echocardiograms was significantly limited. Efforts to standardize clinical echocardiographic protocols to include apical 2‐ and 3‐chamber views and TDI will improve the ability to quantitate LV function.
Background
Cor Triatriatum Sinister (CTS) is a rare congenital anomaly with an estimated incidence of 0.4%, resulting from abnormal left atrial septation. It may present in isolation or in association with other heart defects. High percentage of patients require surgery with low mortality and recurrence rates. CTS has been classified in the past however we aim to describe a case series with more comprehensive and inclusive classification.
Methods
This was a single‐center retrospective cohort study of 16 children with the diagnosis of CTS between 2000 and 2020. Medical records were reviewed for clinical presentations, hospital, and postoperative courses.
Results
Sixteen patients (63% female), with a median age at diagnosis of 4.3 months, five (31%) were neonates. Six (38%) had isolated CTS, two (13%) with functional single ventricle (SV), and the remaining eight patients (50%) had other associated heart defects (septal defects in three, coarctation of the aorta in another three, and anomalous pulmonary venous connections in three). Eight patients (50%) presented with obstructed CTS. Twelve patients (75%) underwent surgical intervention. Mortality occurred in three patients (19%) with two surgical (one with total anomalous pulmonary venous connection and another with SV) and one nonsurgical (septal defect with Fanconi anemia). The surgical median follow up was 4.7 years. Recurrence of the membrane occurred in two patients (17%).
Conclusions
This study showed good long‐term outcomes for patients with isolated and complex CTS. Complete and proper classification of CTS ensures appropriate diagnosis, surgical planning, and better family counseling which may correlate with outcomes.
Research describing fetal arterial structure and function is lacking within the literature. This study's purpose was to measure intima‐media thickness (IMT), compliance and distensibility of 24‐ to 25‐week fetuses' abdominal aortas using conventional ultrasonography from 16 diabetic (DM) and 25 non‐diabetic mothers (NDM). We found no significant differences in fetal abdominal aorta IMT (P = .68), diameter distensibility (P = .22), or cross‐sectional distensibility (P = .23). However, both fetal abdominal aortic diameter compliance (P = .03) and cross‐sectional compliance (P = .005) were greater in DM than in NDM (P = .005). This study demonstrates that it is possible and potentially useful to measure fetal abdominal aorta biometrics and biomechanical characteristics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.