BackgroundBy changing the paradigm of neonatal intensive care and integrating parents into the care team, the ‘family integrated care’ (FICare) model developed in Canada ensures that infants receive more consistent care and parents are better able to care for their infants within the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and at home. However, Chinese health policy dictates that parents are not allowed into the NICU during their infant’s stay, which inhibits this type of parent–infant interaction and may affect infant outcomes. This project aims to demonstrate that allowing parents to care for their newborn infants in the NICU improves the medical outcomes of infants.Methods/DesignThis cluster randomized controlled trial will evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of FICare in six Chinese tertiary-level NICUs in China – three ‘intervention’ and three ‘control’ NICUs. The study steps are: (1) planning and preparation; (2) staff recruitment and training; (3) pilot study in two centers; (4) interim analysis and confirmation of sample size for main study; (5) implementation of main study; (6) data analysis and preparation and publication of study reports. The primary outcome measure is duration of hospital stay from admission to discharge. Secondary outcome measures are: (1) clinical outcomes, such as nosocomial infection, (2) weight gain, (3) breastfeeding, (4) time to full feed, and (5) maternal stress.DiscussionThis study will assess the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of FICare in China. By establishing that FICare is a practical model of NICU care for stable preterm infants in China, this project will have a significant impact on health outcomes, medical practice and policy, and the cost of medical care. The approach used in this project could be transferable to many other areas of medical care, such as pediatrics, chronic care, and geriatrics. Data in this project can be used to inform health policy in NICUs across China so that parents are allowed to enter the NICU and be at their infant’s bedside during the baby’s hospitalization, and modifying the design of NICUs in China to facilitate the participation of parents in caring for their newborns.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-14004736
In the past decade, there has been significant improvement in clinical and genetic diagnosis of WAS in Chinese. We demonstrated excellent long-term survival in patients who underwent HSCT. Early workup for transplant should be advocated for children with classical WAS before they suffer from major disease complications and morbidities.
Jaundice is common in ethnic Chinese infants, but to our knowledge Crigler-Najjar syndrome (CN syndrome) type I has never been reported in China. A Chinese girl with severe jaundice was recently diagnosed to have CN syndrome type I by analyzing the bilirubin-uridinediphospho (UDP)-glucuronosyltransferase gene (UGT1A1). The patient was homozygous for a nonsense mutation that replaced glutamine (CAG, amino acid 239) with stop codon (TAG) at nucleotide number 715 (715C-->T) in exon 1. No mutation was found in exons 2-5. Her parents were heterozygous for the same mutant. The patient had an average bilirubin level of 300-500 mumol/L and a peak of 701 mumol/L. Daily phototherapy for 15 h was required to keep the bilirubin levels within 280-320 mumol/L. The unconjugated hyperbilirubinaemia apparently resulted from homozygous nonsense mutation of UGT1A1, which could completely abolish the UGT activity towards bilirubin (hepatic glucuronidation) and result in CN syndrome type I. Identification of the genetic defect is very useful for gene therapy, especially for DNA/RNA chimera therapy, and can be used as an antenatal screening test to identify the affected offsprings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.