Background and Aims: As the merits of screening at-risk populations for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear, we compared the clinico-pathologic features and survival of patients with cirrhosis and HCC detected by screening (Group A) to that in non-screened cases (Group B). Methods: We studied cirrhotics who developed HCC between 1994 and 2002. During this period, cirrhotics managed by the Gastroenterology Unit were regularly screened at 6-12 monthly intervals while those managed by other hospital units were not. Demographic data, tumor details, treatment received and survival were recorded and compared according to screening status. Results: There were 96 cases identified; 41 by screening (group A) and 55 by non-screening methods (Group B). HCC in Group A were smaller (P < 0.01), more likely unilobar (P < 0.01), at an early stage (P < 0.0005) and before vascular invasion (P < 0.005) than Group B cases. The frequency of hepatic surgery and/or local ablation was higher in Group A than Group B (P = 0.001). Overall median survival of Group A was 882 days versus 99 days in Group B (P < 0.0001). One-and 3-year probabilities of survival in Group A were 89% and 38%, versus 33% and 19% in Group B (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of survival included screening, Child-Pugh score, creatinine, tumor stage and absence of alcohol as the etiology. Conclusions: Screening for HCC in cirrhosis identifies tumors at an earlier stage, results in a higher chance of receiving curative treatment and possibly improves patient survival. The absence of alcoholic liver disease impacts favorably on survival.

International controlled trials have demonstrated increasing sustained virological response (SVR) rates to interferon-based therapies in hepatitis-C-treated patients. Response rates of 6-20% in the era of interferon monotherapy are compared with 42-82% with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. The virological durability of the SVR is unknown and the optimal follow-up for these patients is unclear. The aim of our study was to determine SVR rates and the durability of the response to interferon-based therapies in the clinical setting. From our database of 1540 hepatitis C patients, 344 treatment courses of at least 12 weeks duration were identified, including interferon monotherapy (175 patients), interferon plus ribavirin (96 patients) and peginterferon plus ribavirin (73 patients). Interferon monotherapy was associated with an SVR rate of 5% in 103 genotype 1 patients and 25% in 72 genotype 2/3 patients. Response rates were higher (P < 0.001) with interferon plus ribavirin-41% in 34 genotype 1 patients and 73% in 62 genotype 2/3 patients-and with peginterferon plus ribavirin-47% in 47 genotype 1 patients and 79% in 26 genotype 2/3 patients. Of 147 patients with an SVR, 146 (>99%) remained hepatitis C virus PCR negative during a mean 2.3 years (range 0.3-10.3) of follow-up. In conclusion, with advances in therapies, we are achieving higher response rates in hepatitis C patients treated in the clinical setting. We can now expect an SVR in over half of the treated patients. Importantly, the response is durable and medium and long-term follow-up of these patients are of low yield and largely unnecessary.

The cost of managing patients with CHB disease varies significantly between the noncirrhotic CHB/compensated cirrhosis states and the other four disease states. Within the noncirrhotic CHB state, there is also a significant difference between the cost of managing active and inactive disease. These results will be useful in future cost-effectiveness analyses of prevention and treatment options.

No abstract