Objectives Paediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) after neonatal arterial switch operation (ASO) for transposition of the great arteries (TGA) is a clinically recognised entity with an estimated incidence of 0.6%-1.0%. Nevertheless, a clinical characterisation is lacking. We present an international cohort of children with PAH after neonatal ASO for TGA and describe epidemiology and clinical course. Methods Data were collected of children with PAH after neonatal ASO (≤6 weeks after birth) for simple TGA without residual shunt defects, identified in four national paediatric PAH networks in Europe and one US referral centre. Results Twenty-five children were identified between 1989 and 2014. In 17 children (68%), PAH was detected <1 year after ASO. In the remaining children, PAH was detected after median 64 months (IQR 19.5, 94.5). Nineteen children (96%) received PAH-targeted therapies. During follow-up after ASO (median 5.2 years), eight children died, four underwent lung transplantation and two received a Potts shunt. 1-year and 5-year Potts shunt-and transplantation-free survival after ASO was 100% and 73%. From first PAH detection, this was 100% and 58%, respectively, which did not differ between children with early (<1 year after ASO) or late PAH detection. Conclusions The occurrence of PAH after ASO for TGA represents a specific association. PAH onset may be early or late after ASO, with similar fatal course from first PAH detection. Mechanisms leading to PAH in this association are unknown, but may include abnormal prenatal pulmonary haemodynamics and/or genetic susceptibility. Routine, lifelong follow-up for children who undergo ASO for TGA should include screening for PAH.

Background The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is developed to overcome lead-related complications and systemic infections, inherent to transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) therapy. The PRAETORIAN trial demonstrated that the S-ICD is non-inferior to the TV-ICD with regard to the combined primary endpoint of inappropriate shocks and complications. This prespecified secondary analysis evaluates all complications in the PRAETORIAN trial. Methods The PRAETORIAN trial is an international, multicenter, randomised trial in which 849 patients with an indication for ICD therapy were randomised to receive an SICD (N = 426) or TV-ICD (N = 423) and followed for a median of 49 months. Endpoints were device-related complications, lead-related complications, systemic infections and the need for invasive interventions. Results Thirty-six device-related complications occurred in 31 patients in the S-ICD group of which bleedings were the most frequent. In the TV-ICD group 49 complications occurred in 44 patients of which lead-dysfunction was most frequent (HR 0.69; P =0.11). In both groups half of all complications were within 30 days after implantation. Lead-related complications and systemic infections occurred significantly less in the S-ICD group compared to the TV-ICD group (P &lt;0.001, P =0.03 respectively). Significantly more complications required invasive interventions in the TV-ICD group compared to the S-ICD group (8.3% vs. 4.3%, HR 0.59; P =0.047). Conclusions This secondary analysis shows that, lead-related complications and systemic infections are more prevalent in the TV-ICD group compared to the S-ICD group. In addition, complications in the TV-ICD group were more severe as they required significantly more invasive interventions. This data contributes to shared decision making in clinical practice.

Background and aims: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease as a result of high LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C). The clinical diagnosis can be made with the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria (DLCN criteria). FH is an underdiagnosed disorder, possibly due to false negative LDL-C interpretation during lipid lowering therapy (LLT). We hypothesized that automated health record-based integration of data can provide a signal to facilitate identification of FH patients. Methods: We included patients with LDL-C ≥6.5 mmol/l after correction for LLT in all patients testing LDL-C in Northwest Clinics, The Netherlands. Patients previously diagnosed with FH were excluded. The primary endpoint was the additional number of patients with DLCN criteria ≥6 points after correction for LLT. Secondary endpoints were the additional number of patients with DLCN criteria ≥6 points after also adding data on patient-and family history, and LDL-C before and after correction for LLT. Analysis was performed in a daily automated routine (HiX ChipSoft). Results: In a total of 41,937 individual LDL-C measurements during 26 weeks, we found 351 patients with LDL-C ≥6.5 mmol/l after automated correction for LLT. FH had previously been diagnosed in 42 patients. In the remaining 309 patients (58.3% female; age: 66 ± 11 yrs (mean ± SD); 85.8% on LLT), the number of patients with DLCN criteria ≥6 points increased from 9 to 95 after correction for LLT, and to 127 after also adding patient and family history. The mean LDL-C before and after correction for LLT was 4.69 ± 1.42 mmol/l and 8.16 ± 1.68 mmol/l, respectively (mean ± SD; p < 0.001). Conclusions: We conclude that automated medical record-based integration of LDL-C, LLT and patient-and family history can provide a crucial signal to facilitate identification of FH. Whether this signal results in subsequent genetic identification of FH patients and their relatives requires further study.