SummaryThe Quadriplegia Index of Function (QIF) was originally developed by the authors in 1980 because the popular Barthel Index was deemed too insensitive to document the small but significant functional gains made by quadriplegics (tetraplegics) during medical rehabilitation. The QIF has now been tested on a group of 30 complete quadriplegic patients at admission to and discharge from inpatient medical rehabilita tion. Resultant scores were compared to those simultaneously obtained by the Barthel Index and the Kenny Self-Care Evaluation. The QIF was found to be more sensitive (46 per cent improvement as opposed to 30 per cent by the Kenny Self Care Evaluation and 20 per cent by the Barthel Index). The QIF was also tested for reliability. Ratings by three different nurses, working independently, were found to be significantly positively correlated for all sub-scores (p < '001). We conclude that the QIF provides a useful option in choosing afunctional assessment instrument for use with quadriplegic patients.

A coherent review of wartime nursing.

No abstract

The specific maneuvers that cause women to be incontinent can become important diagnostic aids and major factors in differentiating the effectiveness of the current pharmacological, surgical, and behavioral treatments for urinary incontinence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether meaningful dimensions could be identified within the multiple movements that produce urine loss in stress-incontinent women. The Stress Incontinence Questionnaire (SIQ) was constructed from items derived from a compilation of studies and reports of urinary incontinence experts. An exploratory factor analysis using maximum likelihood method of extraction and a varimax rotation procedure identified four dimensions: active maneuvers, passive maneuvers, planned maneuvers, and unplanned maneuvers. The alpha coefficients for the four identified factors were acceptable and ranged from .71 to .79, with 8-week test-retest correlations for the active (r = .87), passive (r = .87), planned (r = .85), and the unplanned maneuvers (r = .60) all highly significant. The four factors also showed differential patterns of relationships with various gynecologic and urologic measures. These latter findings suggest that the factors identified in this study may be acknowledging different types or components of stress incontinence. In either case, the findings may have implications for treatment approaches to stress incontinence. Further research is needed to substantiate the various components of stress incontinence found in this study and the implications these findings may have for treatment of incontinence.