ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the prevalence of certain oral characteristics usually associated with Down syndrome and to determine the oral health status of these patients.MethodsThe cross-sectional study was conducted among patients attending a special education program at Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi, India. The study design consisted of closed-ended questions on demographic characteristics (age, sex, and education and income of parents), dietary habits, and oral hygiene habits. Clinical examination included assessment of oral hygiene according to Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S), dental caries according to decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index, periodontal status according to the Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN), and malocclusion according to Angles classification of malocclusion. Examinations were carried out using a using a CPI probe and a mouth mirror in accordance with World Health Organization criteria and methods. Craniometric measurements, including maximum head length and head breadth were measured for each participant using Martin spreading calipers centered on standard anthropological methods.ResultsThe majority of the patients were males (n = 63; 82%) with age ranging from 6–40 years. The Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score of the patients indicated that 31% had moderate mental disability and 52% had mild mental disability. 22% exhibited hearing and speech problems.12% had missing teeth and 15% had retained deciduous teeth in adult population. The overall prevalence of dental caries in the study population was 78%. DMFT, CPITN and OHI scores of the study group were 3.8 ± 2.52, 2.10 ± 1.14 and 1.92 ± 0.63 respectively. The vast majority of patients required treatment (90%), primarily of scaling, root planing, and oral hygiene education. 16% of patients reported CPITN scores of 4 (deep pockets) requiring complex periodontal care. The prevalence of malocclusion was 97% predominantly of Class III malocclusions. Further 14% presented with fractured anterior teeth primarily central incisor. The percentage means of cephalic index was 84.6% in the study population. The brachycephalic and hyperbrachycephalic type of head shape was dominant in the Down syndrome individuals (90%).ConclusionThe most common dentofacial anomaly seen in these individuals was fissured tongue followed by macroglossia.
Clonidine added to local anaesthetics prolongs the duration of anaesthesia and analgesia of peripheral, neuraxial and retrobulbar blocks. The present randomized blinded controlled study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the addition of clonidine to local anaesthetic mixture on the quality, onset time, duration of peribulbar block, perioperative analgesia and patients' comfort. The study comprised two groups of 12 patients each. Group A (control) patients received 7 ml of a mixture of 2% lignocaine and hyaluronidase with 1 ml normal saline, while group B (clonidine group) patients had clonidine 1 µg/kg added to the above mixture. Onset and duration of lid akinesia, globe anaesthesia and akinesia, time to first analgesic medication and total analgesic requirement were assessed. Patients were monitored for heart rate, blood pressure, sedation and respiratory depression. Addition of clonidine to local anaesthetic mixture resulted in a significant increase in duration of lid akinesia (85.4±25.6 vs 173.3±35.3 min, P<0.001), globe anaesthesia (63.2±6.9 vs 78.8±17.5 min, P=0.012) and globe akinesia (161.3±24.3 vs 201.2±45.7 min, P=0.016). The onset time and quality of block were similar in both the groups. No significant haemodynamic, respiratory or sedative effects were recorded. The perioperative pain scores and the analgesic requirements were significantly (P<0.01) lower in group B patients. We found that addition of clonidine 1 µg/kg to local anaesthetic mixture significantly increases the duration of anaesthesia and analgesia after peribulbar block.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.