This pilot study suggests the SIMS-A is a useful self-report measure to assist clinicians and adolescent patients to understand a behaviour that may be associated with shame, guilt or other difficult emotions for the adolescent. Results also support the contention that there are often multiple and conflicting motivations for self-injury. Self-injury in this population was more common and severe in female adolescents compared to males, while clinical depression was a risk factor for self-injury in both males and females. The small sample size of adolescent inpatients is an important limitation of this pilot study, and research using the SIMS-A in larger samples is warranted.

Background: Early warning tools have been widely implemented without evidence to guide (a) recognition and (b) response team expertise optimisation. With growing databases from MET-calls and digital hospitals, we now have access to guiding information. The Queensland Adult-Deterioration-Detection-System (Q-ADDS) is widely used and requires validation.Aim: Compare the accuracy of Q-ADDS to National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Between-the-Flags (BTF) and the electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage Score (eCART)).Methods: Data from the Chicago University hospital database were used. Clinical deterioration was defined as unplanned admission to ICU or death.Currently used NEWS, BTF and eCART trigger thresholds were compared with a clinically endorsed Q-ADDS variant.Results: Of 224,912 admissions, 11,706 (5%) experienced clinical deterioration. Q-ADDS (AUC 0.71) and NEWS (AUC 0.72) had similar predictive accuracy, BTF (AUC 0.64) had the lowest, and eCART (AUC 0.76) the highest. Early warning alert (advising ward MO review) had similar NPV (99.2À99.3%), for all the four tools however sensitivity varied (%: Q-ADDS = 47/NEWS = 49/BTF = 66/eCART = 40), as did alerting rate (% vitals sets: Q-ADDS = 1.4/NEWS = 3.5/ BTF = 4.1/eCART = 3.4). MET alert (advising MET/critical-care review) had similar NPV for all the four tools (99.1À99.2%), however sensitivity varied

Background: Ryan's Rule is a three-step escalation process established by Queensland Health whereby patients, their families and carers can escalate concerns if a patient's health is worsening or not improving as expected. This study analysed the incidence, causes and outcomes of Ryan's Rule cases involving patients admitted under various surgical specialties across Queensland. Methods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of cases wherein Ryan's Rule was invoked by surgical patients between 2016 and 2021. The analysis focused on rationale for invoking Ryan's Rule, clinical actions undertaken, outcomes and patient feedback. Results: The study analysed 364 activations of Ryan's Rule among surgical patients admitted across ten Queensland Health hospitals. The common causes for invoking Ryan's Rule were concern or disagreement regarding the management plan (39%), poor understanding of the care plan (32%) and feeling that concerns were not being heard (35%). Less than 1 % of cases (0.8%) met early warning criteria for deterioration, and only 0.5% required admission to ICU. The majority of Ryan's Rule cases (92%) were resolved through discussion between the treating surgical team, the patient and their representatives. In 74% of cases, the management plan did not change following the Ryan's Rule review. Conclusion: Communication is the overwhelming theme throughout the Ryan's Rule cases invoked by surgical patients. The majority of Ryan's Rules cases were initiated by issues in communication and understanding between clinicians and patients. The vast majority of cases were resolved by surgical teams establishing and maintaining clear communication with patients, their families and carers.

This uncontrolled trial suggests quetiapine is an effective first-line treatment in young early psychosis patients. Prospective consent is a major barrier to evaluating acute care for psychotic disorder.

No abstract