The purpose of this study was to compare different methods for assessing plyometric ability during countermovement (CMJ) and drop jumps (DJ) in a group of adults and adolescents. Ten resistance-trained adult men (age: 22.6 ± 1.6 years) and ten adolescent male basketball players (age: 16.5 ± 0.7 years) performed a CMJ and a DJ from a height of 0.40 m. Jump height (JH), contact time, normalized work (WNORM), and power output (PONORM) during the absorption and propulsion phases were calculated from force platforms and 3-D motion analysis data. Plyometric ability was assessed using the modified reactive strength index (RSIMOD during CMJ) and the reactive strength index (RSI during DJ) as well as three indices using propulsion time, propulsion work (PWI), and propulsion power. Adults jumped significantly higher than adolescents (mean difference [MD]: 0.05 m) while JH (MD: 0.05 m) and ground contact time (MD: 0.29 s) decreased significantly from CMJ to DJ. WNORM (MD: 4.2 J/kg) and PONORM (MD: 24.2 W/kg) during the absorption phase of CMJ were significantly less than these variables during the propulsion phases of the jumps. The reactive strength index variants increased significantly from the CMJ to DJ (MD: 0.23) while all other plyometric indices decreased significantly. Neither RSIMOD nor RSI contributed significantly to the prediction of JH during CMJ and DJ, respectively, while PWI was able to explain ≥68% of the variance in JH. Variants of the reactive strength index do not reflect the changes in mechanical variables during the ground contact phase of CMJ and DJ and may not provide an accurate assessment of plyometric ability during different vertical jumps.

PURPOSE:To investigate the effects of two non-ballistic squat and two ballistic jump squat protocols performed over multiple sets on mechanical variables. METHODS: In a counterbalanced cross-over design, 11 resistance-trained men (age: 21.9 ± 1.8 years; height: 1.79 ± 0.05 m; mass: 87.0 ± 7.4 kg) attended four testing sessions during a three week period where they performed multiple sets of squats and jump squats with a load equivalent to 30% 1-repeititon maximum under one of the following conditions: 1) three sets of four non-ballistic repetitions (30N-B), 2) three sets of four non-ballistic repetitions with a 3-second pause between the eccentric and concentric phases (30PN-B), 3) three sets of four ballistic repetitions (30B), 4) three sets of four ballistic repetitions with a 3-second pause between the eccentric and concentric phases (30PB). Force plates and a 3-D motion analysis system were used to determine the mean vertical velocity, mean vertical force, and mean power output during each repetition.

Moir, GL, Munford, SN, Moroski, LL, Davis, SE. The effects of ballistic and nonballistic bench press on mechanical variables. J Strength Cond Res 32(12): 3333-3339, 2018-The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of ballistic and nonballistic bench press performed with loads equivalent to 30 and 90% 1 repetition maximum (1RM) on mechanical variables. Eleven resistance-trained men (age: 23.0 ± 1.4 years; mass: 98.4 ± 14.4 kg) attended 4 testing sessions where they performed one of the following sessions: (a) 3 sets of 5 nonballistic repetitions performed with a load equivalent to 30% 1RM (30N-B), (b) 3 sets of 5 ballistic repetitions performed with a load equivalent to 30% 1RM (30B), (c) 3 sets of 4 nonballistic repetitions with a load equivalent to 90% 1RM (90N-B), or (d) 3 sets of 4 ballistic repetitions with a load equivalent to 90% 1RM (90B). Force plates and a 3-dimensional motion analysis system were used to determine the velocity, force, power output (PO), and work during each repetition. The heavier loads resulted in significantly greater forces applied to the barbell (mean differences: 472-783 N, p < 0.001), but lower barbell velocities (mean differences: 0.85-1.20 m·s, p < 0.001) and PO (mean differences: 118-492 W, p ≤ 0.022). The ballistic conditions enhanced the mechanical variables only at the lower load, with 30B producing significantly greater force (mean difference: 263 N, p < 0.001), velocity (mean difference: 0.33 m·s, p < 0.001), and PO (mean difference: 335 W, p < 0.001) compared with 30N-B. Furthermore, the increase in PO across the 3 sets in 30B was significantly different from all other conditions (p = 0.013). The total mechanical work performed was significantly greater for the conditions with the heavier loads compared with those with the lighter loads (mean differences: 362-5,600 J, p < 0.001) and that performed during the ballistic conditions was significantly greater than that performed during the nonballistic conditions with the same load (mean differences: 945-1,030 J, p < 0.001). Ballistic bench press may be an effective exercise for developing PO, and multiple sets may elicit postactivation potentiation that enhances force production. However, these benefits may be negated at heavier loads.

Moir, GL, Munford, SN, Snyder, BW, and Davis, SE. Mechanical differences between adolescents and adults during two landing phases of a drop jump task. J Strength Cond Res 36(4): 1090–1098, 2022—The mechanical differences between the first and second landing phases of a drop jump (DJ) task performed by adolescent and adult male players were investigated. Eleven adolescent basketball players (age: 16.5 ± 0.7 years) and 11 resistance-trained adults (age: 22.3 ± 1.9 years) performed DJs from a height of 0.40 m. Force plates and a 3-dimensional motion analysis system were used to determine mechanical variables, including landing velocity, normalized vertical stiffness, normalized peak impact force, and work as well as mechanical characteristics of the hip, knee, and ankle joints during the absorption phase of each landing. The adolescents produced greater peak impact forces (mean difference [x¯Diff] = 42 N·kg0.67; effect size [ES] = 1.15) and vertical stiffness (x¯Diff = 126 N·kg0.67·m−1; ES = 1.28) during shorter absorption phases (x¯Diff = 0.09 seconds; ES = 2.67) compared with the adults, despite their lower landing velocities (x¯Diff = 0.21 m·s−1; ES = 1.37). Furthermore, the adolescents generated greater peak extensor joint moments at the lower-body joints compared with the adults (x¯Diff = 2.3 N·m·kg0.67; ES = 1.17), but they did not effectively modulate the energy absorbed by the joint moments in response to the changing demands of the landing tasks. The assessment of the biomechanical characteristics of the 2 landing phases associated with a DJ task revealed that adolescent male basketball players adopt neuromuscular strategies that may increase the risk of incurring musculoskeletal injuries compared with resistance-trained adults.