Introduction:The use of opioid medication for nonmalignant chronic pain (NMCP) increased dramatically during the last 20 years. There have been regulatory changes implemented to reduce the risk of harm to both patients and society. Much of the burden of monitoring these patients is falling on primary care physicians (PCPs), who do not have the time or resources to handle what is entailed in a best-practice approach to NMCP.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with all patients on opioid medication for NMCP who were enrolled onto an individual PCP's practice. All were required to engage with a new care system. Patients had the option to remain on opioids, to wean opioids, or to transfer care. Patients who remained in the practice on opioids were required to have an office visit on a day dedicated solely to NMCP every 3 months. Each visit involved verifying the controlled substance contract, a urine drug screen, board of pharmacy monitoring, pain-targeted history and physical, calculation of the average morphine equivalents used, and evaluations of pain, functional status, and mood. Characteristics more likely to lead to weaning from opioids were monitored, as was the program effect on the patients remaining on opioids.Results: With this practice model, 32 patients treated with opioids for NMCP were enrolled. Of these, 38% (n ‫؍‬ 12) elected to wean opioids, 53% (n ‫؍‬ 17) continued opioid medication, and 9% (n ‫؍‬ 3) transferred care. Mean morphine equivalent mg/day was the prime determinant for ability to wean (17.01 mg/day) compared with maintaining (30.61 mg/day) (P ‫؍‬ .0397; CI, 0.68 to 26.51). Patients maintaining opioid treatment showed no statistically significant change in any measured data point from beginning until end of the evaluation period.Conclusion: Given the choice of following a specific structured care system of opioid medication management or leaving the practice, most patients agreed to the structured system. This approach provided a high degree of compliance with controlled substance regulations and is associated with a reduced number of opioid prescriptions. Patients who were on lower doses of opioid medication are more likely to wean their use with this model. (J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:57-63.)

Though inter-facility acute care patient transfers from resource-limited rural hospitals are necessary, it is desirable to minimize them for several reasons. Some transfers might be potentially avoidable with appropriate pre-transfer teleconsultation. We conducted a retrospective record review of adult patient transfers to our rural academic medical center for medical-surgical services or critical care to estimate the frequency of potentially avoidable patient transfers and to identify any re-quested specialty that was more often associated withpotentially avoidable patient transfers. Excluded were patients transferred via trauma network or for obstetrics care. Transfers were judged potentially avoidable if resulting in live discharge within 48 hours without procedures or intensive care. We studied patient demographics and transferring facility characteristics.We examined 1,180 transfers between June 2016 and January 2017 and judged 21.6% (N=255) potentially avoidable. Transfers for Neurology consultation were 2.5 times (95% CI 1.2 -5.0) more likely to be avoidable relative to transfers for General Surgery. Neurology was the only specialty associated with a greater likelihood of potentially avoidable transfers than the comparator specialty.A significant proportion of inter-facility patient transfers to our facility are potentially avoidable. Neurology-related transfers might warrant pre-transfer teleconsultation.

The authors have no financial disclosures to declare and no conflicts of interest to report.

No abstract