The P67L mutation is associated with a mild disease, even when combined with the severe ΔF508 mutation.

Background The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada officially launched ‘Competence by Design’ in July 2017, moving from time-based to outcomes-based training. Transitioning to competency-based medical education (CBME) necessitates change in resident assessment. A greater frequency of resident observation will likely be required to adequately assess whether entrustable professional activities have been achieved. Purpose Characterize faculty and resident experiences of direct observation in a single paediatric residency program, pre-CBME implementation. Qualitatively describe participants’ perceived barriers and incentives to participating in direct observation. Methods Surveys were sent to paediatric residents and faculty asking for demographics, the frequency of resident observation during an average 4-week rotation, perceived ideal frequency of observation, and factors influencing observation frequency. Descriptive data were analyzed. Institutional research ethics board approval was received. Results The response rate was 54% (34/68 faculty and 16/25 residents). When asked the MAXIMUM frequency FACULTY observed a resident take a history, perform a physical examination, or deliver a plan, the median faculty reply was 1, 2, and 3, for outpatient settings and 0, 1, and 2, for inpatient settings. The median RESIDENT reply was 2, 4, and 10 for outpatient settings and 1, 2, and 20 for inpatient settings. When asked the MINIMUM frequency for each domain, the median FACULTY and RESIDENT reply was 0, except for delivering a plan in the inpatient setting. Faculty reported observing seniors delivering the plan more frequently than junior residents. Faculty and resident median replies for how frequently residents should be observed for each domain were the same, three to four, three to four, and five to six times. Four per cent of faculty reported regularly scheduling observations, and 77% of residents regularly ask to be observed. The most common barriers to observation were too many patients to see and both faculty and residents were seeing patients at the same time. Most faculty and resident responders felt that observation frequency could be improved if scheduled at the start of the rotation; faculty were provided a better tool for assessment; and if residents asked to be observed. Conclusions This study provides baseline data on how infrequent faculty observation is occurring and at a frequency lower than what faculty and residents feel is necessary. The time needed for observation competes with clinical service demands, but better scheduling strategies and assessment tools may help.

BACKGROUND Transitioning to competency-based medical education (CBME) necessitates change in resident assessment. A greater frequency of resident observation will be required to adequately assess whether entrustable professional activities have been achieved. OBJECTIVES Characterize faculty and resident experiences of direct observation in a single Canadian Paediatric Residency program, pre-CBME implementation. Describe faculty and residents’ perceived barriers and incentives to participating in direct observation. DESIGN/METHODS Surveys were sent to faculty and residents asking for demographic information, the frequency of resident observation during an average 4-week rotation in several domains (taking a history, performing a physical examination, delivering a plan,...), perceived ideal frequency of observation, and factors influencing observation frequency. Descriptive data was analyzed. Institutional research ethics board approval was received. RESULTS The response rate was 54% (34/68 faculty and 16/25 residents). When asked the MAXIMUM frequency faculty observed a resident take a history, perform a physical examination, or deliver a plan, the median FACULTY reply was 1, 2, and 3, for outpatient settings and 0, 1, and 2, for inpatient settings, respectively. The median RESIDENT reply was 2, 4, and 10 for outpatient settings and 1, 2, and 20 for inpatient settings, respectively. When asked the MINIMUM frequency for each domain, the median FACULTY AND RESIDENT reply was 0, except for delivering a plan in the inpatient setting (median RESIDENT reply was 2). FACULTY and RESIDENT median replies for how frequently residents should ideally be observed for each domain were the same, 3–4, 3–4, and 5–6 times. 4% of faculty reported regularly scheduling observations, and 77% of residents regularly ask to be observed. The most common responses to barriers to observation were too many patients to see and that both faculty and residents were seeing patients at the same time. Most faculty and resident responders felt that observation frequency could be improved if they were scheduled at the start of the rotation, if faculty were provided a better tool for assessment, and if residents asked to be observed. CONCLUSION This study provides baseline data on how infrequent faculty observation of residents is occurring and at a frequency lower than what faculty and residents feel is necessary. The time needed for observation is felt to compete with clinical service demands, but better scheduling strategies and assessment tools may help increase the frequency of resident observation.

.

No abstract