There is no validated diagnostic test or gold standard for SIBO. In this context, the most practical method to evaluate SIBO in studies at this time would be a test, treat, and outcome technique.

Acute infection with C. jejuni 81-176 precipitates alterations in stool consistency, bacterial overgrowth and rectal lymphocytosis consistent with findings in IBS patients.

Exenatide is a novel and safe treatment option for SBS. It produced substantial improvement in the bowel habits, nutritional status and quality of life of SBS patients. Successful treatment with exenatide may significantly reduce the need for parenteral nutrition and small bowel transplant.

Modern methods of diagnosing diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (D-IBS) require a "diagnosis of exclusion" approach. In this study we aim to test the diagnostic ability of using the fluctuation of frequency and consistency of bowel patterns in IBS to discriminate it from other causes of diarrhea. Eligible subjects were asked to complete a questionnaire on the changes in form and frequency of bowel habits by time. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of having irregularly irregular bowel function and form as more characteristic of IBS versus non-IBS causes. Patients were prospectively recruited from a tertiary care GI clinic. Subjects had to have diarrhea as their primary complaint. In the case of IBS, D-IBS subjects were recruited. Subjects with celiac disease, Crohn's and ulcerative colitis were recruited for comparison and were categorically called "non-IBS." Non-IBS subjects could not have a recent history of blood in stool or a history of bowel surgery, fistulae or narcotic use. Sixty-two IBS and 37 non-IBS subjects were recruited. Among the 62 IBS subjects, 49 (79%) stated that their bowel habits varied in form and frequency on a daily basis compared to 35% in non-IBS subjects (OR = 8.9, CI = 3.5-22.5, P < 0.00001). When subjects were compared by the number of different stool forms they had witnessed in the prior week, IBS subjects noted 3.58 +/- 0.19 types and non-IBS reported 2.35 +/- 0.16 (P < 0.00001). Using > or = 3 stool forms per week as a method of discriminating IBS from non-IBS, 50 out of 62 subjects with IBS (81%) reported this greater number of forms compared to 15 out of 37 (41%) non-IBS subjects (sensitivity = 0.81; specificity = 0.60). The use of this simple tool that identifies an irregularly irregular bowel form and function is successful in separating D-IBS from non-IBS subjects.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal condition whose cause remains unknown. Therefore, most of our effort in treating IBS has been based on a symptom approach. Recent evidence is beginning to suggest that subjects with IBS may have an alteration in gastrointestinal flora. Specifically, findings suggest that IBS patients have excessive bacteria in the small bowel, known as bacterial overgrowth. Although diagnostic testing for bacterial overgrowth is somewhat controversial, as there is no true gold standard test for bacterial overgrowth, antibiotic-based therapies for IBS are now shown to be very effective in treating IBS. Follow-up work in this area has even begun to demonstrate associative factors between gut bacteria and IBS that may explain the different types of IBS. The best example of this is the finding that methanogenic organisms in IBS patients are wholly associated with constipation-predominant IBS. It seems that the methane gas emitted during fermentation may have an influence on gut motility. In this review, the evidence for gut ecology associations in IBS is presented. A treatment algorithm also is proposed based on these findings. New areas of research in IBS such as gut bacteria are changing the treatment approach in IBS from a symptom-based style to one that is hypothesis driven.