Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common cause of gastrointestinal-related morbidity and mortality in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Its onset is sudden and the smallest, most premature infants are the most vulnerable. Necrotizing enterocolitis is a costly disease, accounting for nearly 20% of NICU costs annually. Necrotizing enterocolitis survivors requiring surgery often stay in the NICU more than 90 days and are among those most likely to stay more than 6 months. Significant variations exist in the incidence across regions and units. Although the only consistent independent predictors for NEC remain prematurity and formula feeding, others exist that could increase risk when combined. Awareness of NEC risk factors and adopting practices to reduce NEC risk, including human milk feeding, the use of feeding guidelines, and probiotics, have been shown to reduce the incidence of NEC. The purpose of this review is to examine the state of the science on NEC risk factors and make recommendations for practice and research.

DDI clinical decision support alerts need major improvements. We provide recommendations for healthcare organizations and IT vendors to improve the clinician interface of DDI alerts, with the aim of reducing alert fatigue and improving patient safety.

In response to unprecedented financial government incentives, electronic health record (EHR) adoption has tripled since 2009. While EHR benefits are emphasized, research demonstrates that adoption may result in unintended consequences that nurse administrators can anticipate and mitigate. Unintended consequences are defined as unplanned effects, whether positive or negative. Little is known about nursing perceptions and experience of unintended consequences arising from EHR implementation, and nursing studies are minimal in comparison with research on experience among their interprofessional colleagues. The purpose of this article is to present the state of the science on nurses' experiences with unintended consequences of EHRs derived from a systematic review that includes 4 original studies. Findings demonstrate that nurses experience changes to workflow, must continually adapt to meet patient's needs in the context of imperfect EHR systems, and have difficulty accessing the information they need to make patient care decisions. Even so, most state they would not revert to paper records if given the choice. Implications for nurse administrators include the need for continual engagement with nurses along the continuum of EHR design, as well as the need to encourage nurses to speak up and acknowledge workflow changes that threaten patient safety or do not support work efficiency.

As organizations adopt electronic health records (EHRs), nurses frequently encounter system barriers and difficulty performing role expectations. This article describes nurses' experiences with unintended consequences emerging from the use of an EHR. In some situations, nurses were positively deviant when encountering unintended consequences relating to EHRs to accomplish patient care or protect patient safety. Nurses engaged in work-arounds to provide patient care when the EHR did not meet their needs, sometimes in positively deviant ways. Qualitative data were collected from 5 open-ended questions at the end of a quantitative survey. Analysis included coding of responses and organization of processes in line with the triangle model, a human factors framework, to identify overarching themes. Five themes emerged: (1) User support after implementation of EHR; (2) User satisfaction with EHR; (3) Communication for patient care, quality, and safety; (4) Effort to complete tasks; and (5) Areas for improvement. Nurses' ability to adopt positive deviance as they experience unintended consequences offers opportunities for organizations to engage nursing perspectives in improving the EHR and engineer it to be more resilient to nursing work.