Cancer pain management can be improved by overcoming patients' attitudinal barriers to reporting pain and using analgesics. A simple cost-effective barriers intervention designed to reach a large number of persons with cancer has not yet been tested. Such an intervention should be tested against barriers' assessment-alone, as well as no-treatment control. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of a Tailored Barriers Intervention (TBI), an educational intervention tailored to participants' attitudinal barriers toward reporting pain and using analgesics. This was a randomized three-group (TBI, assessment-alone, or control) trial with measures at baseline and 28 days later conducted at the NorthCentral and Heartland offices of the Cancer Information Service (CIS), an NCI program that provides information to persons seeking answers to cancer-related questions. Participants (1256 adult CIS callers diagnosed with cancer with moderate to severe pain in the past week) joined the study and were randomized. Of those participants, 970 (77.23%) provided follow up data. The TBI consisted of educational messages tailored to each participant's attitudinal barriers, delivered orally over the telephone, followed by a printed mailed copy. The outcome measures were attitudinal barriers to pain management, as well as pain outcomes (duration, severity, and interference with life activities). At follow-up the TBI group had significantly lower attitudinal barriers scores compared to assessment-alone and control, but the groups did not differ on the pain outcome variables. TBI and assessment alone had similar cost effectiveness. The TBI needs to be strengthened to achieve reductions in pain severity.

Although cancer presents obstacles for all who experience it, persons in rural communities must negotiate additional challenges. This study determined the cancer information (CI) needs and the CI-seeking behavior and preferences among rural-dwelling persons. Patients (N = 801) = 50 years of age seen in 36 rural Kansas primary care practices completed a Cancer Care Information Needs Survey (CCINS); physicians completed a cancer resource knowledge and preference survey. Of the 801 patients, 184 (23%) reported a CI need. Of these 184 patients, 45% reported either not discussing cancer or having insufficient discussion time with their physicians; 44% needed more information after consulting their physician. Patients more likely to report a CI need were young, female, Internet users, persons with a prior cancer diagnosis, and persons seeing male physicians or physicians in group/multispecialty practices. Patients and physicians were unfamiliar with services provided by national cancer organizations. Physicians are a primary CI source; however, patients who need CI report insufficient cancer discussion time with their physician and need more CI after consulting their physician. Promoting access to national CI sources could bridge the CI needs gap that exists in rural areas currently.

No abstract