No abstract

Background and Aims:The most frequent concern of patients receiving epidural analgesia for labour pain relief is post-partum back pain. This survey was designed to assess the prevalence of post-partum backache with and without epidural analgesia among post-partum women.Methods:The study was conducted at a university teaching hospital and women presenting to labour room for labour and delivery formed the target population. A total of 482 women were recruited during the study period. Response rate was 95.4% and these cases were included in our statistical analysis. Two forms were designed for data collection before and after delivery; form I was filled by one of the investigators while form II was filled by a research assistant to prevent bias which included follow-up of back pain. The primary outcome variable was backache quantified with visual analogue scale score. Out of 460 women, 230 women received epidural analgesia for labour and 230 women had not.Results:The prevalence of post-partum back pain in epidural analgesia versus non epidural analgesia groups was 40.9% versus 40% on day one and 32.2% versus 35.2% after 1 week. However, after one and 3rd months follow-up, backache prevalence was less in epidural analgesia group (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.99) and (unadjustedd OR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.15-0.69) respectively. The adjusted odd ratio was 0.59 at 1st month and 0.25 at 3rd month. There was no significant difference between the two groups in pain scores.Conclusion:There was no association between the epidural analgesia and post-partum back pain

No abstract

Background The advent of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) has reduced respiratory events in comparison to the conventional endotracheal tubes. Any manipulation under a light plane of anesthesia predisposes to increased airway sensitivity followed by adverse events. The reduced airway sensitivity in the deeply anesthetized state makes LMA removal feasible. In the past, the respective advantages and disadvantages of extubation in two planes of anesthesia have led to conflicting results. The primary objective of this study is to compare the incidence of adverse respiratory events at the time of LMA removal, in deeply anesthetized and awake groups. Our secondary objective was to record the management of complications. Materials and methods We conducted a prospective randomized control trial in 106 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients undergoing lower umbilical surgeries over a period of one year. The demographic details and intraoperative and postoperative variables, i.e., airway obstruction, laryngospasm, peripheral oxygen desaturations, cough, straining and vomiting, along with corrective measures were recorded by the primary research assistant in both groups. Regarding the management of peripheral oxygen desaturation (less than 90%), airway obstruction, and laryngospasm, 100% fractional inspired oxygen support and chin lift/jaw thrust were used. Results The average age was 32.58±15.81 months. The demographic characteristics of the patients were not significant between the two groups. The rate of adverse respiratory events like laryngospasm and airway obstruction was relatively high in the deep group but not statistically significant between the groups. A total of 7 (6.6%) patients had laryngospasm, 21 (20%) had airway obstruction, 16 (15%) had a cough and 11 (10%) patients had observed peripheral oxygen desaturation (less than 90%) between both groups. Conclusion We concluded that adverse respiratory events could happen in both awake and deep planes of anesthesia after the removal of LMA in children. Furthermore, both techniques have an acceptably low frequency of complications, and it does not affect the current clinical practice.

Identifying medication errors is one method of improving patient safety. Peri operative anesthetic management of patient includes polypharmacy and the steps followed prior to drug administration. Our objective was to identify, extract and analyze the medication errors (MEs) reported in our critical incident reporting system (CIRS) database over the last 15 years (2004–2018) and to review measures taken for improvement based on the reported errors. CIRS reported from 2004 to 2018 were identified, extracted, and analyzed using descriptive statistics and presented as frequencies and percentages. MEs were identified and entered on a data extraction form which included reporting year, patients age, surgical specialty, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) status, time of incident, phase and type of anesthesia and drug handling, type of error, class of medicine, level of harm, severity of adverse drug event (ADE) and steps taken for improvement. Total MEs reported were 311, medication errors were reported, 163 (52%) errors occurred in ASA II and 90 (29%) ASA III patient, and 133 (43%) during induction. During administration phase 60% MEs occurred and 65% were due to human error. ADEs were found in 86 (28%) reports, 58 of which were significant, 23 serious and five life-threatening errors. The majority of errors involved neuromuscular blockers (32%) and opioids (13%). Sharing of CI and a lesson to be learnt e-mail, colour coded labels, change in medication trolley lay out, decrease in floor stock and high alert labels were the low-cost steps taken to reduce incidents. Medication errors were more frequent during administration. ADEs were occurred in 28% MEs.