Background Short-term recurrence of positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA PCR in discharged COVID-19 patients attracts the public’s concern. This study aimed to determine clinical and epidemiological results of such patients. Methods This retrospective study was conducted on 32 designated hospitals for COVID-19 patients discharged from January 14 th to March 10 th, 2020. After 28-day followed-up, re-positive patients confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 RNA RT-PCR were re-admitted to hospital for further treatments. All the close contacts of re-positive patients were asked 14-day self-segregating. Data of epidemiology, symptoms, laboratory tests and treatments were analyzed in re-positive patients and their close contacts were investigated. Results Of 1,282 discharged patients, 189 (14.74%) were tested re-positive of SARS-CoV-2 RNA during 28-day follow-up. The median time from discharge to re-positivity was 8 days (IQR 5-13). Patients in re-positive group were younger (34yr vs 45yr, p&0.001) with higher proportion of moderate symptoms (95.77% vs 84.35%, p&0.001) in the first hospitalization than negative group. During the second hospitalization, all re-positive patients showed normal in peripheral white blood cell and lymphocyte, and no new symptoms of COVID-19; 78.31% further improved on chest CT scan compared with the first discharge, yet 25.93% accepted antiviral therapy. The median time of re-positive to negative was 8 days (IQR 4-15). None of close contacts developed COVID-19. Conclusions Our data suggested that the short term recurrence of positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA in discharged patients is not a relapse of COVID-19, and the risk of onward transmission is very low. This provides important information for managing COVID-19 patients.
Background: Around the globe, moderate cases account for the largest proportion of all coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, and deteriorated moderate patients contribute the most in mortality. However, published articles failed to address the deterioration details of moderate cases, especially on when and how they deteriorated.Methods: All moderate COVID-19 patients hospitalized in Guangdong Province from January 14 to March 16, 2020, were included in this multicenter retrospective cohort study and were divided into deteriorated and non-deteriorated groups according to clinical status. Symptoms and demographic, therapeutic, and laboratory test result characteristics were collected to explore the features of disease deterioration.Results: Of 1,168 moderate patients included, 148 (13%) deteriorated to severe (130 cases) or critical (18 cases) status. Over 20% of the older subgroup (>50 years old) showed deterioration. The median time for deterioration was 11 days after onset [interquartile range (IQR) 9–14 days]. In addition, 12.2% severe cases could further develop to critical status after 3 days (IQR 2–6.5 days) of having a severe condition. Respiratory dysfunction and hypoxia were the major manifestations as disease deterioration, while 76 cases (52.1%) showed respiratory rate >30 breaths/min, 119 cases (80.4%) showed SaO2 <93%, 100 cases (67.5%) had 201 < PaO2/FiO2 < 300, and 27 cases (18.9%) had blood lactic acid >2.0 mmol/L. In view of multiple organ dysfunction, 87.8% of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 20.2% of acute kidney injury (AKI), 6.8% of coagulopathy, 4% of acute heart failure (AHF), 3.4% of acute hepatic injury (AHI), and 5.4% of shock occurred in deteriorated patients, while organ injury occurred in the following sequence: ARDS, AKI, AHF, coagulopathy, AHI, and shock.Conclusions: The deteriorated pattern of moderate COVID-19 patients is characterized as the 11th day from onset (IQR 9–14 days) being an important time point of disease deterioration with further exacerbation to critical condition in 3 days (IQR 2–6.5 days), A RDS followed by AKI being the typical modes of sequential organ damage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.