BackgroundThis study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the survival rates after segmentectomy, wedge resection, or lobectomy in patients with cStage IA lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).MethodsWe enrolled 4,316 patients who had cStage IA lung SCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Cox proportional hazards model was conducted to recognize the potential risk factors for overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). To eliminate potential biases of included patients, the propensity score matching (PSM) method was used. OS and LCSS rates were compared among three groups stratified according to tumor size.ResultsKaplan–Meier analyses revealed no statistical differences in the rates of OS and LCSS between wedge resection (WR) and segmentectomy (SG) groups for patients who had cStage IA cancers. In patients with tumors ≤ 1 cm, LCSS favored lobectomy (Lob) compared to segmentectomy (SG), but a similar survival rate was obtained for wedge resection (WR) and lobectomy (Lob). For patients with tumors sized 1.1 to 2 cm, lobectomy had improved OS and LCSS rates compared to the segmentectomy or wedge resection groups, with the exception of a similar OS rate for lobectomy and segmentectomy. For tumors sized 2.1 to 3 cm, lobectomy had a higher rate of OS or LCSS than wedge resection or segmentectomy, except that lobectomy conferred a similar LCSS rate compared to segmentectomy. Multivariable analyses showed that patients aged ≥75 and tumor sizes of >2 to ≤3 cm were potential risk factors for OS and LCSS, while lobectomy and first malignant primary indicator were considered protective factors. The Cox proportional analysis also confirmed that male patients aged ≥65 to <75 were independent prognostic factors that are indicative of a worse OS rate.ConclusionsThe tumor size can influence the surgical procedure recommended for individuals with cStage IA lung SCC. For patients with tumors ≤1 cm, lobectomy is the recommended approach, and wedge resection or segmentectomy might be an alternative for those who cannot tolerate lobectomy if adequate surgical margin is achievable and enough nodes are sampled. For tumors >1 to ≤3 cm, lobectomy showed better survival outcomes than sublobar resection. Our findings require further validation by randomized controlled trial (RCT) or other evidence.

BackgroundMalignant mesothelioma (MMe) is a rare and fatal cancer with a poor prognosis. Our study aimed to compare the overall survival (OS) of MMe patients across various sites and develop a prognostic model to provide a foundation for individualized management of MMe patients.MethodsFrom the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 1,772 individuals with malignant mesothelioma (MMe) were identified. The X-tile software was used to identify the optimal cut-off point for continuous variables. The Kaplan–Meier method was employed to compare the survival of MMe across different sites. The Cox proportional hazards model was applied to identify the independent risk factors of overall survival (OS) and a nomogram was constructed.ResultsIn the survival analysis, MMe originating from the reproductive organs and hollow organs showed a relatively better prognosis than those originating from soft tissue, solid organs, and pleura. Age, gender, location, histological type, grade of differentiation, extent of disease, lymph node status, lymph node ratio (LNR), and chemotherapy were all found to be independent risk variables for the prognosis of MMe patients (P<0.05) in a multivariate Cox analysis and were included in the construction of nomogram. In the training and testing sets, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.701 and 0.665, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rate was 0.749, 0.797, 0.833 and 0.730, 0.800, 0.832, respectively. The calibration curve shows that the nomogram is well-calibrated.ConclusionsThis is the first research to examine the prognosis of MMe patients based on the location. However, previous studies often focused on malignant pleural mesothelioma or malignant peritoneal mesothelioma with high incidence. Furthermore, a nomograph with good prediction efficiency was established according to the variables that influence patient survival outcomes, which provides us with a reference for clinical decision-making.

To investigate the clinical value of CTR, CEA, histological type, Ki-67 and EGFR in detecting pathological lymph node metastasis (pN) in clinical stage IA (cIA) lung adenocarcinoma and to construct a pN Nomogram model. A total of 374 cIA lung adenocarcinoma patients who had undergone thoracoscopic radical resection with Systematic mediastinal lymph node dissection (SMLD) in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into pN(+) and pN(-) groups. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the independent risk factors of pN in lung cancer patients. The ROC curve was used to compare the accuracy of CTR, CEA and Ki-67 in predicting pN. R software was used to construct a Nomogram prediction model based on multivariate Logistic regression analysis of the pN risk. The C-index was calculated, and a calibration curve was drawn to judge the calibration degree of the model. The preoperative and intraoperative examinations showed that CTR (OR 570.406, P＜0.001), CEA (OR 1.239, P＜0.001) and micropapillary adenocarcinoma (OR 86.712, P＜0.001) were independent risk factors of pN. Immunohistochemical analysis and gene detection showed that Ki-67 index (OR 4.832, P＜0.001) and EGFR mutations, such as exon 19 (OR 10.319, P＜0.001), exon 21 (OR 7.163, P＜0.001) and exon 19+20 mutations (OR 570.406, P＜0.001), were significant factors in predicting pN. CTR, CEA, histological type, Ki-67 index, and EGFR mutations are the predictive factors of pN in cT1a-3aN0M0 lung adenocarcinoma patients. SMLD is recommended to improve patients’ postoperative survival rate when preoperative CTR≥0.775, CEA＞2.52μg/L or intraoperative rapid freezing pathology shows micropapillary components.