With the increasing demand from aging population and seasonal blood shortage, recruiting and retaining blood donors has become an urgent issue for the blood collection centers in China. This study aims to understand intention to donate again from a social cognitive perspective among whole blood donors in China through investigating the association between the blood donation fear, perceived rewards, self-efficacy, and intention to return. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six cities, which are geographically and socioeconomically distinct areas in Jiangsu, China. Respondents completed a self-administrated questionnaire interviewed by two well-trained medical students. A total of 191 blood donors were included in the current study. Descriptive analysis, correlation analysis, and a generalized linear regression model were used to explore the association between demographic characteristics, psychological factors, and intention to donate again. After controlling other covariates, donors with higher fear scores reported lower intention to return (p = 0.008). Association between self-efficacy and intention to return was statistically significant (p < 0.001), whereas the association between intrinsic rewards (p = 0.387), extrinsic rewards (p = 0.939), and intention to return were statistically insignificant. This study found that either intrinsic rewards or extrinsic rewards are not significantly associated with intention to donate again among whole blood donors in China, and fear is negatively associated with intention to donate again. Therefore, purposive strategies could be enacted beyond appeals to rewards and focus on the management of donors’ fear.
IntroductionThe policy focus of contracted family doctor services (CFDS) has been shifting to improve quality and efficiency in China. The study’s objective was to establish a quality evaluation scale for CFDS based on the perceived service quality model and to assess the service quality from the perspective of patient perceptions and expectations.MethodsData were obtained from a 2-year follow-up survey of CFDS in Jiangsu, China. A total of 1264 elderly people with chronic diseases were tracked. The self-developed scale was designed based on the perceived service quality model. The product scale method was used to assign weighted values, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the differences over the 2 years, and pooled cross-sectional regression was conducted to evaluate the associated factors with the gap scores of service quality.ResultsThere were significant differences between perceptions and expectations in each dimension in the 2 years (p<0.05), and the service quality gaps existed. Over the 2 years, Accessibility and Horizontal continuity were the first-ranked and second-ranked in expectations; the top three scores in perception were Horizontal continuity, Comprehensive service and Accessibility dimensions. The service quality gap in 2020 was smaller than that in 2019 (p<0.05). There were differences in the perception scores in the Vertical continuity, Technical and Economic dimensions and in the expectation scores in the Horizontal continuity, Vertical continuity and Technical dimensions between the 2 years (p<0.05). The factors that were significantly associated with each dimension score included the Jiangsu region, gender, age and education levels (p<0.05).ConclusionThe quality evaluation scale of CFDS has good reliability and validity. Policy efforts should be focused on accelerating the development of medical alliances, optimising medical insurance policies and improving the capacity of family doctor services to meet the needs of the elderly with chronic diseases.
IntroductionDisabilities may raise heavy medical expenses and rich-poor inequalities. However, data is lacking for the Chinese older populations. This study aimed to measure socioeconomic inequalities in medical expenses amongst the Chinese adult 45 years or older, and explored the main determinants among different disability categories.MethodData from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were used. Disabilities were divided into five categories: physical disabilities, intellectual disability, vision problems, hearing problems, and multiple disabilities. The two-part model was employed to identify the factors that are associated with medical expenditures. Socioeconomic inequalities were measured by the concentration index (CI), and the horizontal inequity index (HI) which adjusts for health needs. Decomposition analysis was further applied to evaluate the contribution of each determinant.ResultsTwo thousand four hundred nineteen people were included in this study. The CIs and HIs of the expenditure were both positive. Amongst the varied types of medical expenses, the highest CIs were found for self-treatment expenses (0.0262). Amongst the five categories of disabilities, the group with vision problem disability reported the highest CIs and HIs for outpatient expenses (CI = 0.0843, HI = 0.0751), self-treatment expenses (CI = 0.0958, HI = 0.1119), and total expenses (CI = 0.0622, HI = 0.0541). The group of intellectual disability reported the highest CI and HI (CI = 0.0707, HI = 0.0625). The decomposition analysis showed that income (80.32%), education (25.14%) and living in the rural areas (13.96%) were the main determinants of medical expenses for HI amongst all types of disabilities.ConclusionFor five types of disabilities, our data shows that medical expenses concentrated in the richer groups in China. Income, education, and rural areas factors were the main contributors to the economic-related inequalities. Health policies to improve the affordability of medical care are needed to decrease inequity of medical expenditures for people with disabilities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.