This paper reports on a field experiment in 82 high schools trialing a low-cost intervention in schools' operations: teachers working in the same school observed and scored each other's teaching. Students in treatment schools scored 0.07 student standard deviations higher on math and English exams. Teachers were further randomly assigned to roles-observer and observee-and students of both types benefited, observers' students perhaps more so. Doubling the number of observations produced no difference in student outcomes. Treatment effects were larger for otherwise low-performing teachers.
Pakistan's Punjab province has witnessed numerous education reforms in recent years. Many of these reforms have been aimed at improving the well-documented low levels of learning by focusing on improving teaching quality. The rhetoric suggests that government schools, particularly those in rural areas with a more disadvantaged pupil base, are especially ineffective at imparting learning. This paper seeks to investigate whether children in rural Punjab are learning literacy and numeracy over the course of a year, and if so, are some pupils progressing more than others. Using recently collected data, it finds that children in our sample are making progress. Variation in progress is found to be greater within schools rather than across them. The competence and qualifications of a teacher also makes a significant difference to a child's academic progress. The paper further finds differential progress for rich and poor students within schools, suggesting an important role for education policy to put in place targeted support towards those from disadvantaged backgrounds to ensure improvements in their learning keep pace with their peers.
Quantifying the impact of teaching quality on pupil learning, and understanding what teacher characteristics or practices are likely to improve student achievement, are pressing research questions in all countries. Empirical evidence also needs to be context specific since different education systems are likely to have different facilitators and barriers to good teaching. Existing evidence, largely from the US, suggests a number of strong research designs that enable researchers to model the impact of teaching on pupil achievement. However, operationalising these models in more resource-constrained contexts is challenging. In this paper we describe our attempt to model the impact of teachers and their practices on pupil achievement using the quantitative data generated for this research (household and school surveys with a teacher survey and an attempt to assess teacher knowledge). We describe the challenges when trying to implement this
This paper investigates the economic (i.e., labor market) outcomes of
“training” for individuals in Pakistan. The labor market benefits of general education
have been relatively well explored in the literature and specifically in Pakistan. They
point to the benefits of education accruing both from education or skills that promote
a person’s entry into more lucrative occupations and from raising earnings within
any given occupation. This research delves into another angle by investigating the
role, if any, of acquired “training“—technical, vocational, apprenticeship, or on-thejob—
and its impact through both channels of effect on economic wellbeing. This is
done using data from a unique, purpose-designed survey of more than 1,000
households in Pakistan, collected in 2007. Multinomial logit estimates of
occupational attainment show how training determines occupational choice. In
addition, we estimate the returns to schooling and to training separately for men and
women. The results show that, while training significantly improves women’s
chances of entering self-employment and wage work (as well as the more “lucrative”
occupations), only wage-working women benefit from improved earnings through
the training they have acquired. On the other hand, men who have acquired skills
this way benefit through an improved probability of being self-employed and earning
higher returns within that occupation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.