Background:Survival after major trauma is considered to be time dependent. Efficient prehospital care with rapid transport is the norm in developed countries, which is not available in many lower middle and low-income countries. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of prehospital time and primary treatment given on survival of major trauma patients in a setting without prehospital care.Materials and Methods:This prospective observational study was carried out in a university hospital in Mumbai, from January to December 2014. The hospital has a trauma service but no organized prehospital care or defined interhospital transfer protocols. All patients with life- and/or limb-threatening injuries were included in the study. Injury time and arrival time were noted and the interval was defined as “prehospital time” for the directly arriving patients and as “time to tertiary care” for those transferred. Primary outcome measure was in-hospital death (or discharge).Results:Of 1181 patients, 352 were admitted directly from the trauma scene and 829 were transferred from other hospitals. In-hospital mortality was associated with age, mechanism and mode of injury, shock, Glasgow Coma Score <9, Injury Severity Score ≥16, need for intubation, and ventilatory support on arrival; but neither with prehospital time nor with time to tertiary care. Transferred patients had a significantly higher mortality (odds ratio = 1.869, 95% confidence interval = 1.233–2.561, P = 0.005) despite fewer patients with severe injury. Two hundred and ninety-four (35%) of these needed airway intervention while 108 (13%) needed chest tube insertion on arrival to the trauma unit suggesting inadequate care at primary facility.Conclusion:Mortality is not associated with prehospital time but with transfers from primary care; probably due to deficient care. To improve survival after major trauma, enhancement of resources for resuscitation and capacity building of on-duty doctors in primary centers should be a priority in countries with limited resources.

No abstract

A positive predictive value of 3 or more factors was over 95 %, necessitating an endoscopic intervention. A negative predictive value of the absence of any factor was 100 %, which ruled out CBD calculi. If only one or two factors are positive, then further evaluation is recommended preferably using non-minimal or minimal invasive investigations like EUS or MRCP.

No abstract

Background:The presentation of penile fracture may vary depending on the delay to seek medical attention and on the presence of associated injuries. Delay in presentation has been linked previously to embarrassment associated with this condition.Aims and Objectives:The study aims to share our clinical experience in management of penile fracture and its complications and specifically highlights the impact of time delay on post-operative outcome in patients presenting with penile fracture.Material and methods:The study is a prospective observational study conducted from July 2014 till January 2017. All the patients presenting to the emergency with a clinical presentation of penile fracture and a tear in the tunica albuginea of the penile cavernosal tissue, confirmed on ultrasound were included in this study and intraoperative and postoperative data was analysed.Results:The most common cause for fracture noted was coitus. The average time delay from the time of insult to presentation to the emergency department was 25.11 ± 12.48 hours. The parameters that have significantly been altered by a time delay of more than 24 hours include post-operative wound infection, erectile dysfunction at 1-year, post-operative hospital stay. Two patients develop chordee at 6 and 9 months respectively and both patients presented beyond 24 hours. All patients with hematoma size on color Doppler of more 10cc and intraoperative tear >10mm had developed post-operative wound infection. Patients with urethral injury or post-operative cavernositis or wound infection had significant association with erectile dysfunction.Conclusion:Penile fracture although a rare urologic emergency, it has a significant impact on sexual health of a young man. An early intervention along with identifying and managing early complications factors would help patients of fracture penis lead an almost normal sexual life.